Could it be said...

[PR Boxer]

that Cotto was weight drained if the Cotto - Pacquiao rematch does happens and it's at 147 or higher and Cotto manages to beat Pacquiao? I mean would that validate the excuses that Cotto was weight drained and didn't have a strong corner since Cotto has also changed his trainer?

[SlickTurtle]

Don't know bout the weight drained excuse, but a better corner? Definitely

[jrosales13]

It could be said.

But, it also could be said that for the first time in a very long time he finally is being trained by a real trainer... And, is benefiting by it.

Even for years under Evangelista he was training himself since him and his uncle didn't get along.

[DR.ORGYY]

he aint beating pac either way......

[qwerty07]

Why don't we make these excuses for every single boxer who has ever lost a fight? I can understand these assumptions if the fight was close, but c'mon!

Weight-drainage, shot, past-prime, corner, damaged good....

Does Pac have to kill a man in the ring to get the props he deserves????

[jrosales13]

Why don't we make these excuses for every single boxer who has ever lost a fight? I can understand these assumptions if the fight was close, but c'mon!

Weight-drainage, shot, past-prime, corner, damaged good....

Does Pac have to kill a man in the ring to get the props he deserves????

Actually not only do we but every fighter that losses makes excuses as well...

I give Cotto credit for not making that excuse.

[PR Boxer]

Why don't we make these excuses for every single boxer who has ever lost a fight? I can understand these assumptions if the fight was close, but c'mon!

Weight-drainage, shot, past-prime, corner, damaged good....

Does Pac have to kill a man in the ring to get the props he deserves????

I'm asking if the excuses are valid if that situation happens, not making the excuses up myself.

[AKATheMack]

It means Cotto is roiding nobody gets better as they move up in weight.