Once again,
So you are saying Since Mayweather can Make the most money fighting Pacquiao, Pacquiao should then get 50%????
Is that your position?
Because if it is, than Wasnt De la hoya vs. Pacquiao the biggest fight that could happen in boxing in 2008 and brought de la hoya the most money..? Why didnt Pacquiao asked for 50% then and was he entitled to it??
Wasnt Mayweather vs. De la hoya the biggest fight in 2007 and brought de la hoya the most money ?
Was Mayweather entitled to 50%?
Just because you bring your opponent his potential biggest payday doesnt mean you deserved 50%, it means you deserve to get your fair market value, and it means you should get more than what you possibly get otherwise.
But not 50%.
your welcome
So you are saying Since Mayweather can Make the most money fighting Pacquiao, Pacquiao should then get 50%????
Is that your position?
Because if it is, than Wasnt De la hoya vs. Pacquiao the biggest fight that could happen in boxing in 2008 and brought de la hoya the most money..? Why didnt Pacquiao asked for 50% then and was he entitled to it??
Wasnt Mayweather vs. De la hoya the biggest fight in 2007 and brought de la hoya the most money ?
Was Mayweather entitled to 50%?
Just because you bring your opponent his potential biggest payday doesnt mean you deserved 50%, it means you deserve to get your fair market value, and it means you should get more than what you possibly get otherwise.
But not 50%.
your welcome

Comment