Bob Arum: "Pac would not fight without Freddie Roach"

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

And every poster here knows that he wouldnt either.

[jri9d0]

So I guess your implying the fight of the century has to wait to 2011?

[johnm is...]

He wouldn't be asked to. Apparently most of the Pacquiao fans are in agreement that Manny doesn't have the skills Mayweather has, thus needs his trainer more than Mayweather does.

Who'd have thought?

[Uturn]

Is that not obvious? I wouldn't want to see Pacman fighting without Roach in his corner. Roach is the truth.

[pistol whip]

So I guess your implying the fight of the century has to wait to 2011?

Of course he is this guys makes every excuse for this fight not to happen. I'm sure in 2011 he will be backing another lame Floyd excuse.

[infamous larryx]

he wouldn't be asked to. Apparently most of the pacquiao fans are in agreement that manny doesn't have the skills mayweather has, thus needs his trainer more than mayweather does.

Who'd have thought?

chuuurch!!!!!!!!!!

[pistol whip]

Is that not obvious? I wouldn't want to see Pacman fighting without Roach in his corner. Roach is the truth.

See that man next to Hatton in your sig? Thats why you can't compare Floyd fighting without Roger to Pac fighting without roach.

[incredible]

And every poster here knows that he wouldnt either.

And your point?

[ADP02]

And every poster here knows that he wouldnt either.

But Floyd has already fought without his current trainer ....

so the question is, will Floyd fight without his current trainer against Manny? and if not, why not this time?

[pistol whip]

He wouldn't be asked to. Apparently most of the Pacquiao fans are in agreement that Manny doesn't have the skills Mayweather has, thus needs his trainer more than Mayweather does.

Who'd have thought?

Once again Floyd mayweather Sr smart guy! *** you read into **** wayyyyyyy to much.