Mayweather's 'Random Blood Tests' Fallacy; Finally Exposed?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Franco2012
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2010
    • 5626
    • 211
    • 139
    • 12,109

    #91
    Still no answer from *****s


    bwahahahahahahahahaha

    Comment

    • Vadrigar.
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 8134
      • 517
      • 415
      • 20,350

      #92
      Originally posted by CungLe
      Where are *****s?

      bwahahahahahahaha
      The wait is painful

      Comment

      • Vadrigar.
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 8134
        • 517
        • 415
        • 20,350

        #93
        Originally posted by 007geyweather
        Lets face it, Floyd wants to fight Pacquiao will all advantage with him. they would even bring up A-side meth.. hahaha lol funny people.
        On top of that, there's the issue of 60/40.

        Comment

        • reigncourts
          Amateur
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 6
          • 0
          • 0
          • 6,035

          #94
          *****s won't come. They would'nt dare touch "Random Blood Testing" with a ten foot pole.

          Comment

          • reigncourts
            Amateur
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 6
            • 0
            • 0
            • 6,035

            #95
            Fallacy is most if not all arguments for Blood Testing were made under the presumption that Tygart and Victor Conte are the experts on drug testing. That’s false. The experts are the medical scientists who developed the test methods and those who implemented the tests in accordance with WADA rules. Tygart and Conte have shown their bias towards the Test for obvious motives.


            Finally exposed in the sense that the true experts have finally expressed their opinions in the NSAC conference to determine any upgrading required for their drug test protocol. NSAC drug testing is no “joke”, contrary to what Tygart and Conte would say in different occasions. It is their meddling with the Commission’s affair that has been shown as "funny" in that conference.

            Comment

            • Vadrigar.
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 8134
              • 517
              • 415
              • 20,350

              #96
              Originally posted by reigncourts
              *****s won't come. They would'nt dare touch "Random Blood Testing" with a ten foot pole.
              haha reigncoutrs, you've been stalking me right?



              jk.........I really liked your Ray leonard/Ali comparisons with Floyd.

              Also thanks for uploading this video as well, I appreciate it. I guess you're quite familiar with my signature as well.

              Comment

              • reigncourts
                Amateur
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 6
                • 0
                • 0
                • 6,035

                #97
                You may call it stalking, but the truth is your posts about my videos caught my attention. I’m not familiar with this site at all. Except when I started posting videos on YT, I posted the original copies of Scientific Analysis …..Parts I & II as my blogs in this site. I’m just wondering if anybody else have seen them.

                Comment

                • Vadrigar.
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 8134
                  • 517
                  • 415
                  • 20,350

                  #98
                  Originally posted by reigncourts
                  You may call it stalking, but the truth is your posts about my videos caught my attention. I’m not familiar with this site at all. Except when I started posting videos on YT, I posted the original copies of Scientific Analysis …..Parts I & II as my blogs in this site. I’m just wondering if anybody else have seen them.
                  Don't worry, I was only joking.

                  Thanks for taking the time to comment though. Much appreciated.

                  BTW is the video just a brief summary of all your blogs then?

                  Comment

                  • reigncourts
                    Amateur
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 6
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    • 6,035

                    #99
                    Parts I & II videos are edited copies of my blogs. Part III & IV are updates as discussions on the subject progressed. Last part is Finally Exposed and is the subject of this thread.

                    Comment

                    • Vadrigar.
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2010
                      • 8134
                      • 517
                      • 415
                      • 20,350

                      #100
                      Originally posted by reigncourts
                      Parts I & II videos are edited copies of my blogs. Part III & IV are updates as discussions on the subject progressed. Last part is Finally Exposed and is the subject of this thread.
                      Thanks for the clarification. I hope to see you share more of your opinions on this site.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP