Calzaghe VS Nunn @ 168---How would you bet?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SNVDoublePunch!
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jun 2010
    • 605
    • 55
    • 16
    • 6,898

    #1

    Calzaghe VS Nunn @ 168---How would you bet?

    Rules:

    1. Take both fighters from their best showing at 168.

    2. Anyone who utters the phrase "46-0" will be punished.







    VS



    13
    Nunn, knockout
    30.77%
    4
    Nunn, close decision
    15.38%
    2
    Nunn, wide decision
    0.00%
    0
    Draw---aka, you're an undecided sissy man
    0.00%
    0
    Calzaghe, knockout
    0.00%
    0
    Calzaghe, close decision
    15.38%
    2
    Calzaghe, wide decision
    30.77%
    4
    Valuev destroys both men with his ATG double punch.
    7.69%
    1
    Last edited by SNVDoublePunch!; 07-05-2010, 08:49 AM.
  • SNVDoublePunch!
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jun 2010
    • 605
    • 55
    • 16
    • 6,898

    #2
    How many of you know Michael Nunn?

    Comment

    • mushahadeen
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 7964
      • 384
      • 321
      • 8,800

      #3
      Originally posted by SNVDoublePunch!
      How many of you know Michael Nunn?
      This guy?

      Comment

      • SNVDoublePunch!
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Jun 2010
        • 605
        • 55
        • 16
        • 6,898

        #4
        Yes, he was stopped once, against a prime James Toney...annnnd?

        Oh, wait...let me guess....46-0?

        Comment

        • mushahadeen
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 7964
          • 384
          • 321
          • 8,800

          #5
          42-0.

          JCC Jr beats Calzaghe and Toney and Nunn.

          Comment

          • the niggest
            Banned
            • Jan 2010
            • 1744
            • 114
            • 12
            • 1,976

            #6
            Michael Nunn with ease.

            Comment

            • Scott9945
              Gonna be more su****ious
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2007
              • 22032
              • 741
              • 1,371
              • 30,075

              #7
              Nunn was at his best at 160. He never reached that level again after the Toney loss. I'd have to give a prime Calzaghe the edge at 168.

              Comment

              • SNVDoublePunch!
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2010
                • 605
                • 55
                • 16
                • 6,898

                #8
                Originally posted by mushahadeen
                42-0.

                JCC Jr beats Calzaghe and Toney and Nunn.
                You know,uh, ...Valuev was actually 46-0 at one time...just saying.

                Comment

                • mushahadeen
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 7964
                  • 384
                  • 321
                  • 8,800

                  #9
                  Originally posted by SNVDoublePunch!
                  You know,uh, ...Valuev was actually 46-0 at one time...just saying.
                  I understand what you're saying. It's just JCC Jr. is too skilled for Valuev. It wouldn't last 4 rounds.

                  Comment

                  • SNVDoublePunch!
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 605
                    • 55
                    • 16
                    • 6,898

                    #10
                    Originally posted by mushahadeen
                    I understand what you're saying. It's just JCC Jr. is too skilled for Valuev. It wouldn't last 4 rounds.
                    I hate to say this, but I think you're biased.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP