Tweet
I dont care what any of you say that are defending him. He is ducking Winky plain and simple. It's not necessarly a bad thing but thats what he's doing.
I think its 50/50 with the Taylor fight and it wouldnt surprise me who won. Then he's going to finish off with Tarver because he can win and if he loses then no one will hold it against him because they will say that he moved up too far and that he was too old, even though his 2 big wins came against guys who were smaller then him and moved up.
Winky is the guy for the 1st time who people really think could beat him and a fight people will love to see. He knew he was going to beat the one dementional Tito, the much smaller Oscar, and now a very inexperienced Taylor. He doesnt know if he can beat a guy like Winky anymore who looked very strong at 160 and has a very tough style. Most experts say that Winky can beat him but now Hopkins doesnt want to fight him? What kind of crap is that. He talks about Winky had his chance but he took the money against Mosley. Duh, why wouldnt he. All Hopkins does is talk about money and takes fights or doesnt take them because of it and now he's going to talk about Winky doing it.
He just doesnt want to give Winky a shot at a very good legacy. He knows that if he loses to Taylor then people will say he was old or if he loses to Tarver then people will say that he was old and small but if he loses to Winky then people will start to question was he really great at all. They will say who did he really beat? A blown up Tito who Winky dominated worst and a very small and way past his prime Oscar. They will say did we let Hopkins play us? He never moved up in weight and he doesnt have a great resume besides Tito and Oscar and I just explained about them.
The reason at the top why I said it maybe ok for him to duck him is because Hopkins was a beast in his prime and I think he would maybe lose now but wouldve kicked Winky's ass back then but there are still alot of questions around Hopkins that we will never know the answer too
I think its 50/50 with the Taylor fight and it wouldnt surprise me who won. Then he's going to finish off with Tarver because he can win and if he loses then no one will hold it against him because they will say that he moved up too far and that he was too old, even though his 2 big wins came against guys who were smaller then him and moved up.
Winky is the guy for the 1st time who people really think could beat him and a fight people will love to see. He knew he was going to beat the one dementional Tito, the much smaller Oscar, and now a very inexperienced Taylor. He doesnt know if he can beat a guy like Winky anymore who looked very strong at 160 and has a very tough style. Most experts say that Winky can beat him but now Hopkins doesnt want to fight him? What kind of crap is that. He talks about Winky had his chance but he took the money against Mosley. Duh, why wouldnt he. All Hopkins does is talk about money and takes fights or doesnt take them because of it and now he's going to talk about Winky doing it.
He just doesnt want to give Winky a shot at a very good legacy. He knows that if he loses to Taylor then people will say he was old or if he loses to Tarver then people will say that he was old and small but if he loses to Winky then people will start to question was he really great at all. They will say who did he really beat? A blown up Tito who Winky dominated worst and a very small and way past his prime Oscar. They will say did we let Hopkins play us? He never moved up in weight and he doesnt have a great resume besides Tito and Oscar and I just explained about them.
The reason at the top why I said it maybe ok for him to duck him is because Hopkins was a beast in his prime and I think he would maybe lose now but wouldve kicked Winky's ass back then but there are still alot of questions around Hopkins that we will never know the answer too
Comment