Bring back the Standing Eight!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Solo322
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jan 2005
    • 289
    • 22
    • 0
    • 6,571

    #1

    Bring back the Standing Eight!

    There's one thing that could solve all these ***** stoppages and give us our money's worth. Why don't the unified rules of boxing use the standing eight? It seems to make sense to me to give the guy some time to recover and get back on his feet. Who knows how many more fights Tommy Hearns would've won if he had just fought with standing eight counts. Anyone agree?
  • scap
    Boxingscene's *****
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2004
    • 7226
    • 385
    • 1
    • 17,023

    #2
    I think the referee should have the ability to call a standing 8 count...have it in his back pocket so to speak...imagine if JL would have gotten the 8 count?

    Comment

    • {BrownBomber}
      R.I.P Chico
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2004
      • 7827
      • 502
      • 564
      • 16,732

      #3
      Originally posted by scap
      I think the referee should have the ability to call a standing 8 count...have it in his back pocket so to speak...imagine if JL would have gotten the 8 count?
      what do think would have happened if JLC got that standing 8 count?

      Comment

      • chavezjr
        Up and Comer
        • May 2005
        • 30
        • 2
        • 1
        • 6,364

        #4
        I definitely agree. There are a lot of times when a fighter is hurt and just won't go down. You know if he just got a few seconds to recover they could get back in there and do fine, but as it is the ref has no other choice but to stop the bout. I'm all for bringing back the standing eight. It's kind of like not giving a boxer a ten-count when he gets knocked down. Of course Castillo should have gotten an eight-count. Now we'll never know.

        Comment

        • AintGottaClue
          What for that be
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2004
          • 6204
          • 221
          • 92
          • 12,939

          #5
          pathetic, STANDING 8 COUNTS ARE FOR ******* AND BIASED REFS, if u are wailign on someone and about to KO him why would u want to ref to step in and save the fighter and rob u of a win if your oppenets come back, standign 8 count is a horrible thing, if the man isnt fighting back and he is on his feet the ref stops it for a tko

          Comment

          • chavezjr
            Up and Comer
            • May 2005
            • 30
            • 2
            • 1
            • 6,364

            #6
            Originally posted by SturmRules
            pathetic, STANDING 8 COUNTS ARE FOR ******* AND BIASED REFS, if u are wailign on someone and about to KO him why would u want to ref to step in and save the fighter and rob u of a win if your oppenets come back, standign 8 count is a horrible thing, if the man isnt fighting back and he is on his feet the ref stops it for a tko
            Biased refs? It gives them an excuse to stop a fight, when a simple standing eight would suffice. When a fighter gets beat up and knocked down, he gets ten seconds to recover. A standing eight counts as a knockdown, just without the fighter having to go to the canvas. Seems reasonable to me that they should get a chance too.

            Comment

            • Solo322
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jan 2005
              • 289
              • 22
              • 0
              • 6,571

              #7
              it's a more fair thing to do, actually. I want to see kos or decisions, tko's always have an uncertain aspect to them. Over the years more and more fights are ended because of the ref's opinion, the standing eight would make it more definitive when the guy actually goes to the canvas.

              Comment

              • Memorex
                King of Kings
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2004
                • 5346
                • 360
                • 378
                • 13,864

                #8
                well the fighters should know when they r in trouble its ok to take a knee. give themselves some time to recover.

                Comment

                • Solo322
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 289
                  • 22
                  • 0
                  • 6,571

                  #9
                  too much pride from these guys. people like gatti would rather die than take a knee.

                  Comment

                  • Slipx
                    Lethal Barefisted
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 3030
                    • 133
                    • 236
                    • 9,967

                    #10
                    Originally posted by memorex
                    well the fighters should know when they r in trouble its ok to take a knee. give themselves some time to recover.
                    unless they're fighting in puerto rico.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP