Anyone else think Nino's win over Mayol was a bit one sided? i missed the fight and only just got around to watching it, the biased ref seemed to favour Nino throughout the fight as he deducted points from Mayol for what seemed to be accidental clashes of heads, the judges scorecards were also ridiculously wide imo, hardly any of the rounds were clear cut rounds for either fighter, its not like Nino was taking it to Mayol and he got the benefit for forcing the fight, he was backing up most of the fight with Mayol dictating controlling distance early, then being more aggressive later in the fight as the silly scorecards were anounced at the midway point due to open scoring, they indicated Mayol was behind so he became more aggressive down the stretch.
Because of point deductions i had it a draw, however without them i would of saw Mayol the winner, what ever the case maybe, i dont think he deserved to lose his title.
Because of point deductions i had it a draw, however without them i would of saw Mayol the winner, what ever the case maybe, i dont think he deserved to lose his title.
Comment