Tweet
B-Hop and Roy originally had the financial part of their last fight contract set up something like this. That way the better fighter that night (lets hope no shady judges scoring that night)gets the bigger piece of the pie.There are some who say winner take all but lets be real about it, no one would take a deal like that unless they had nothing to lose anyway. So any big wigs on this forum go pitch this idea again(they probably kicked it around a few times already but it just makes sense). Everyone wants this fight, but Floyd vs Sergio Martinez wouldnt be a bad consolation tho.
-
-
i would be good but i think its unrealsitic! -
It's a bad idea and doesn't make sense for the following reason:
It puts the officials ie referees and judges under too much pressure. Imagine if scoring one round a certain way equated to a 10 million dollar swing for one guy.
Take the example of Chavez-Taylor when the ref stopped the fight with 2 seconds to go with Taylor up on the scorecards. A call like that loses a certain fighter 10-15 million dollars in a mega money fight such as May-Pac.Comment
-
First of all refs and how they call it come with the territory, judging is just that and as far as the Chavez-Taylor fightwe all learned from that so I dont see a ref blatantly stopping a fight with 2seconds left not to mention don king was behind it. B-Hop and Roy changed the contract cuz Roy lost other wise it would have been 60% for the winner and 70% if by koComment
-
In the unlikely event that Boy agrees to fight Pac;
The ref just needs to be able to count to 10!!!Comment
Comment