Paul Williams gets away with Mediocrity on this forum.

[Jim Jeffries]

Again what does "didnt win" mean?

Well it might mean a draw to anyone who is not ******ed.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I didnt ask what it necessarily doesnt means. I asked what does "didn't win" mean?

What is the opposite of win?

It means "didnt win". Not "lost" which is what you (mis)quoted.

He also did not say "I did the opposite of win against Williams". Please quote accurately. Thanks.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Well it might mean a draw to anyone who is not ******ed.

So anyone who thinks the opposite of win is "lose"...is ******ed?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

It means "didnt win". Not "lost" which is what you (mis)quoted.

He also did not say "I did the opposite of win against Williams". Please quote accurately. Thanks.

"I sincerely think I DID NOT win the fight"

Self explanatory.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

"I sincerely think I DID NOT win the fight"

Self explanatory.

Exactly. He never said he lost to Williams. Just report the actual quotes and there wont be an issue, Joseph Goebbels.

[Jim Jeffries]

So anyone who thinks the opposite of win is "lose"...is ******ed?

Anyone that thinks didn't win means the same thing as lost in boxing is ******ed, yes.

It was the type of fight where it was hard to pick a clear winner and the rightful decision should've been a draw. In that situation he probably felt he didn't do enough to win. Which obviously does not mean that he lost.

But then again, you're the same guy who argued for a week that "Dirk Nowitski isn't white, he's German."





The hilarious thing is, he really doesn't get it, like the guys arguing that the decade isn't over, clinging to the hope that Floyd still has a chance, ROFL.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Exactly. He never said he lost to Williams. Just report the actual quotes and there wont be an issue, Joseph Goebbels.

I got it....

He never said he lost to Paul.

He just said he didnt win the fight against him. Because the oopsite of win is draw. Odd...

Considering Martinez couldve said "I thought the fight was a draw" but he decided to say that he didn't win the fight.

The Judges agreed....so did Martinez.

Paul wins.

[Calilloyd]

Anyone that thinks didn't win means the same thing as lost in boxing is ******ed, yes.

It was the type of fight where it was hard to pick a clear winner and the rightful decision should've been a draw. In that situation he probably felt he didn't do enough to win. Which obviously does not mean that he lost.

But then again, you're the same guy who argued for a week that "Dirk Nowitski isn't white, he's German."





The hilarious thing is, he really doesn't get it, like the guys arguing that the decade isn't over, clinging to the hope that Floyd still has a chance, ROFL.

No worse than you claiming Jack Johnson was not a great American like Joe Louis. Or criticizing Ali for not wanting to be called "Clay". Funny how you would compare the two. And the general consensus for a fighter claiming he feels he didn't win is that he lost. You can play the semantics game if you want,but a draw is not the first thing that would come to mind. unless Martinez specifically said that which he didn't. He doesn't need you to fill in the blanks. Of course you would have to be intelligent to understand that. Not a pseudo conservative, semi literate, tea party member like you.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I got it....

He never said he lost to Paul.

He just said he didnt win the fight against him. Because the oopsite of win is draw. Odd...

Considering Martinez couldve said "I thought the fight was a draw" but he decided to say that he didn't win the fight.

The Judges agreed....so did Martinez.

Paul wins.

Where are you getting this "opposite of win" **** from? Damn you're clutching at straws and pulling **** out of thin air.