Comments Thread For: Carl Froch Claims Kessler Robbery, Attacks Sauerland, More

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BattlingNelson
    Mod a Phukka
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 29840
    • 3,246
    • 3,191
    • 286,536

    #61
    Originally posted by Pullcounter
    I wouldn't fight any Euro boxer in their native country
    So far in the super six it has been the travelling euros that has gotten the raw deal.

    Comment

    • savorduhflavor
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 8194
      • 288
      • 59
      • 14,875

      #62
      Originally posted by BattlingNelson
      So far in the super six it has been the travelling euros that has gotten the raw deal.
      How so?

      Dirrell got robbed. Blatantly robbed.

      Abraham got what he deserved and was on his way to losing a very wide decision.

      Kessler, as much as I like him(he's my favorite in the tournament) was losing to Ward with or without the illegal headbutts.

      Comment

      • BattlingNelson
        Mod a Phukka
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2008
        • 29840
        • 3,246
        • 3,191
        • 286,536

        #63
        Originally posted by savorduhflavor
        How so?

        Dirrell got robbed. Blatantly robbed.

        Abraham got what he deserved and was on his way to losing a very wide decision.

        Kessler, as much as I like him(he's my favorite in the tournament) was losing to Ward with or without the illegal headbutts.
        Froch won a close fight.

        AA-Dirrell had the worst referee in a long time.

        Kessler-Ward. Not calling those flying headbutts and even going to the corner of Kessler to warn him was just appauling.

        And Taylor received a fair KTFO from the Abrahammer.

        Comment

        • Rome-By-Ko
          The winner Is
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 20157
          • 323
          • 332
          • 29,833

          #64
          Originally posted by savorduhflavor
          How so?

          Dirrell got robbed. Blatantly robbed.

          Abraham got what he deserved and was on his way to losing a very wide decision.

          Kessler, as much as I like him(he's my favorite in the tournament) was losing to Ward with or
          without the illegal headbutts.
          I'm starting to question what you guys think is a robbery?Froch Dirrell was a close fight But IMO you have to take the belt from the champ don't you agree?Dirrell did not do that Froch was pushing the action while Dirrell was running around the ring( not boxing there is a difference)The same goes for Froch Kessler but I had that fight much closer.But IMO Kessie did not do enough to take a belt from a champion who was in the fight with him.But I was not mad that Kessie won it was a close fight(I had Froch by two points)Any how Dirrell was not robbed and Froch has a point not to wanna fight in AA hometown.

          Comment

          • Squizz
            Banned
            • Jun 2010
            • 1982
            • 87
            • 97
            • 2,133

            #65
            Froch clearly isn't very gracious in defeat. Say what you want about how Dirrell fought him in England, but at least he accepted his defeat like a man. (Even though I thought he won the fight handidly.) Froch cannot say the same. I hope King Arthur puts him to sleep. Then he'll have no excuses.

            Comment

            • ShoulderRoll
              Join The Great Resist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 55878
              • 10,014
              • 5,015
              • 763,445

              #66
              Originally posted by BattlingNelson
              Froch won a close fight.
              A close fight that he should have lost.

              Originally posted by BattlingNelson
              AA-Dirrell had the worst referee in a long time.
              A referee who missed knockdowns for both fighters. In any case Dirrell was clearly well ahead on all cards, and was winning round 11, when Abraham cheated.

              Originally posted by BattlingNelson
              Kessler-Ward. Not calling those flying headbutts and even going to the corner of Kessler to warn him was just appauling.
              I know you are blinded by your love of Kessler but the headbutts were incidental. And they had less to do with that loss than the fact that Ward just beat Mikkel at every facet of the game.

              Comment

              • Diego Morales
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2007
                • 517
                • 8
                • 0
                • 6,692

                #67
                Originally posted by romebyko
                I'm starting to question what you guys think is a robbery?Froch Dirrell was a close fight But IMO you have to take the belt from the champ don't you agree?Dirrell did not do that Froch was pushing the action while Dirrell was running around the ring( not boxing there is a difference)The same goes for Froch Kessler but I had that fight much closer.But IMO Kessie did not do enough to take a belt from a champion who was in the fight with him.But I was not mad that Kessie won it was a close fight(I had Froch by two points)Any how Dirrell was not robbed and Froch has a point not to wanna fight in AA hometown.

                I agree with this Froch beat Dirrell in a close sloppy fight, Dirrell didn't do enough to win the belt and I thought Froch possibly beat Kessler but ain't mad Kessler got the decision as it was a close competitive fight that could have gone either way, as for the Ward/Kessler fight Kessler just got his ass kicked flat out I don't care about headbutts or whatever else anyone is saying he got outworked and got destroyed!!!!

                Comment

                • Hard Boiled
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 1462
                  • 118
                  • 0
                  • 7,901

                  #68
                  I would not be suprised if Froch girl leaves Froch, Takes the kid, Demands a settlement and sells her story of her time with Froch to the newspapers.

                  Anyway lets hope AA sparks Froch early.

                  Comment

                  • starjammer
                    Sheriff
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 8030
                    • 434
                    • 186
                    • 27,800

                    #69
                    Originally posted by romebyko
                    I'm starting to question what you guys think is a robbery?Froch Dirrell was a close fight But IMO you have to take the belt from the champ don't you agree?Dirrell did not do that Froch was pushing the action while Dirrell was running around the ring( not boxing there is a difference)The same goes for Froch Kessler but I had that fight much closer.But IMO Kessie did not do enough to take a belt from a champion who was in the fight with him.But I was not mad that Kessie won it was a close fight(I had Froch by two points)Any how Dirrell was not robbed and Froch has a point not to wanna fight in AA hometown.
                    No I don't agree with that logic. When boxers enter the ring the Championship should be left outside it. There is no criteria or ruling for scoring extra points to the Champion, nor should a judge lean one way or the other in that regard.

                    Comment

                    • GoogleMe
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 3459
                      • 108
                      • 145
                      • 12,675

                      #70
                      Originally posted by romebyko
                      I'm starting to question what you guys think is a robbery?Froch Dirrell was a close fight But IMO you have to take the belt from the champ don't you agree?Dirrell did not do that Froch was pushing the action while Dirrell was running around the ring( not boxing there is a difference)The same goes for Froch Kessler but I had that fight much closer.But IMO Kessie did not do enough to take a belt from a champion who was in the fight with him.But I was not mad that Kessie won it was a close fight(I had Froch by two points)Any how Dirrell was not robbed and Froch has a point not to wanna fight in AA hometown.
                      I agreed with everything you said, untill you said Kessler - Froch was a close fight.... 116-112, is not close.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP