just as i think it's silly to like pacquiao solely because he's exciting, don't you think it's silly to hate mayweather because he's too technical? or are you the type that purely watches action movies because you need huge explosions every few minutes to keep your attention?
again, just saying, he get's too many points for just hopping around a lot and throwing a million punches. there's more to the sport than hoping and expecting a KO.
oh and lets not go into why pac has the adoration of his fans. please, let's not.
Who the hell hates a boxer who is "too technical"? That's like saying I hate Michael Jordan because he won 6 rings....just doesn't make sense....or just PURE HATE.
I appreciate Floyd's skills too mind you, not a fan of his mouth though, and IDGAS about all those personas and all other ****e he's projecting coz if it works for him then beats me.
Stop whining and just mind yo own ****e and who's fighter you root for, you can't criticize why Pac's being appreciated more by fans who want a good fight.
ODOH Floyd stans always brag about Floyd has more PPV draw, but kept forgetting the reason why the viewers ordered PPV in the first place, to see Floyd lose. But IDGAF.
It's you who instigated all these, not me.
here we go again..ppl order floyds ppv to see him lose. craaaazy.. whatever, you win.
it's not that, it's just I kinda' don't understand it when people say he's the most exciting fighter or whatever. and i guess he is exciting...because i can't say he's boring. but a lot of people i talk to like him for that reason alone. i mean, yeah, we need that element in the sport..but if that's all you're going off on i think your argument is invalid. there's too much hype sometimes around certain boxers which in turn doesn't allow others to shine..others who downright deserve too. that's all i'm saying. we should appreciate other things just as much.
that's all..
Explain?
your original question doesn't ask about other fighters. Your question gets answered, so....next question.
Who the hell hates a boxer who is "too technical"? That's like saying I hate Michael Jordan because he won 6 rings....just doesn't make sense....or just PURE HATE.
i think it's more like saying "i hate san antonio because they're boring". it may not make sense to you but other people prefer offense rather than defense.
why arent u fan of pacquiao??? because your a fan of mayweather??? why does any1 have 2 be pinoy 2 be a fan of pacquiao??? is it because the majority of mayweather fans are african-americans????
it's not that, it's just I kinda' don't understand it when people say he's the most exciting fighter or whatever. and i guess he is exciting...because i can't say he's boring. but a lot of people i talk to like him for that reason alone. i mean, yeah, we need that element in the sport..but if that's all you're going off on i think your argument is invalid. there's too much hype sometimes around certain boxers which in turn doesn't allow others to shine..others who downright deserve too. that's all i'm saying. we should appreciate other things just as much.
that's all..
Getting back to this rebuttle....
Why do people like Lebron James? He hasn't won ****....has always failed on the biggest stages...gets paid a ton of money...yet by basketball standards...is fundamentally horrible. Yet people flock to him and pay some dam good money (82 games a year) to see him dunk on fools, hit buzzer beaters and block shots from behind....why...BECAUSE HE IS EXCITING.
Has nothing to do with boxing...but the comparison is similar to your reasoning about the "Exciting being the only factor"
i think it's more like saying "i hate san antonio because they're boring". it may not make sense to you but other people prefer offense rather than defense.
great example, mayweather is the spurs and pacquiao is like the suns. what team would u rather watch???
Comment