Vazquez is Marquez' Daddy in the Series,

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MACAQUEINBLACK
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 7720
    • 485
    • 1,170
    • 10,473

    #1

    Vazquez is Marquez' Daddy in the Series,

    I define this by who overcame the most adversity, whose will and determination was Greater across the series, specifically the initial trilogy, as the integrity of the fourth fight is questionable.


    On paper the score is even at 2-2. But as closely matched and fought as these fights were, with all the fire and heart and refusal to be conquered that both guys showed, Vazquez had to overcome the most and showed the most IMO, not least that he, while supposedly the lesser technician, was perfectly able to hang with Marquez as a boxer.



    Marquez won the first fight legitimately by busting Izzy's nose to the point where he couldn't breathe.

    In the second, Izzy could only win the fight one way after picking up bad cuts early in the fight that were worsening as they reached the mid-rounds - he had to go for the stoppage quickly, or likely soon be stopped himself on cuts, and he went all out to get it, though not in a frenzy, but in a cool, composed, almost casual manner. The 3 punch combination, body to head with left hook on the end of it, which felled Marquez early in the 6th and set up the finish was stunning, my single favorite example of firepower in the series. Izzy's stoicism and patient, calm application to an urgently pressing situation is a wonder here. "Gahhhddamnit, Israeeeeellllll!!!!!!!!!!"

    The third was a feature-length marvel of ebb and flow, but Vazquez had clearly came out on top by the heat of the 12th, scorecards and arguable split-decision be damned, pouring it on and making Marquez look for all the world like a beaten fighter by the final bell of what had been an incredibly close contest up until that last round. Another minute or round and I believe Marquez would have been stopped - Vazquez was just too much honest desire, too much man for him to handle.

    In the fourth, Vazquez was clearly still capable of being competetive in himself, but it didn't take long to become apparent that the scar-tissue around his eyes simply wasn't up to the task. It was called before the fight, and it wasn't a surprise when it proved to be true. Still, Vazquez battled manfully to stay on his feet, unable to see any punches coming, and had to be protected from himself as the fight was waved off in the 3rd. Marquez was the better preserved of the two fighters despite being slightly older, but Marquez-Vazquez IV proved little else for Marquez, certainly not in terms of clawing back an increment in the true meaning of their man to man rivalry.





    To me, Vazquez' wins are the significantly more clear-cut and defining and he had to overcome the most to earn them.






    Thoughts, arguments?
    Last edited by MACAQUEINBLACK; 06-22-2010, 08:29 AM.
  • Stone Roses!
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 2725
    • 155
    • 102
    • 3,519

    #2
    Vazquez was shot in the 4th. I agree that Vazquez pulled of the more 'gruelling' and hard fought victories.

    Comment

    • GoogleMe
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 3459
      • 108
      • 145
      • 12,675

      #3
      I like your points. But 2-1 in the triology makes you the winner also.

      Comment

      • MACAQUEINBLACK
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 7720
        • 485
        • 1,170
        • 10,473

        #4
        Originally posted by GoogleMe
        I like your points. But 2-1 in the triology makes you the winner also.
        Yeah, but I think the general perception of it was of a tie, though, that you couldn't fairly seperate the guys, just because that third, deciding fight was so close after the 12th and with the contention over the decision.


        I just wanted to make a case for Vazquez being the true winner of the series, something I believe is true, and see what others thought, hear some other theories, defences of Rafa, etc.
        Last edited by MACAQUEINBLACK; 06-22-2010, 11:33 AM.

        Comment

        • savorduhflavor
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 8194
          • 288
          • 59
          • 14,875

          #5
          Marquez clearly won the 3rd fight, 12rd knockdown not withstanding.

          It boggles my mind how that decision doesn't generate more controversy. I think it's the ******ed notion that "if you finish the show you should get the win", over the way fights are scored...round by round.

          The same people who think Vazquez won that fight probably think DLH beat Quartey.

          Comment

          • street bully
            Tua's daddy.
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 25014
            • 697
            • 263
            • 35,118

            #6
            I disagree with you. I believe marquez won the third fight if you go by rounds. He got knocked down in the 12 (held on the ropes), but he himself was legitimatly knocked down, and lost the bulk of the rounds. Sorry to say it but Marquez is better and greater than Vazquez.

            Comment

            • MACAQUEINBLACK
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 7720
              • 485
              • 1,170
              • 10,473

              #7
              Fight III,

              I believe Vazquez was behind Rafa but no more than 2 points behind going into the 12th IMO. But I'll rewatch to try and see where you guys are coming from. That isn't my entire point, though.


              bully, that 4th, where Vazquez was dropped, Marquez came in looking to hurt him some more and got rocked himself - that's what I'm talking about, Vazquez just had more answers to adversity throughout the series. And those reactions, the fire, the moments of fortitude, fixity of purpose and raw character when up against it is what this series is really defined by, not score-cards. Marquez's shining moment in that regard was making it out of the 3rd in the first fight, when Vazquez went after him with relative caution. When Izzy poured it on him in the 6th of the rematch, Izzy finished up the better man. In the rubber-match, when Izzy poured it on in the 12th, regardless of who you have winning on the cards and by how many points, Izzy came out clearly looking like the better man.


              However you score it in V-M III, and Marquez certainly wasn't dishing out any kind of domination, Vazquez had emerged the better guy and was beating the **** out of Marquez by the 12th. And you guys know it. Izzy knew he had to come up with something big in that round and he delivered it in every regard except the stoppage (which was perilously close for an exhausted and ass-whooped Marquez).




              I want more compelling arguments for Marquez re. the actual substance of these fights, not just the cards. Prove to me that Marquez is the better man.





              I don't set out to discredit Marquez in any way, because, naturally, in a series like this, the Glory is essentially shared.

              But real talking, the way I see it, Izzy's wins, and the manner of them, means significantly more than Marquez'.

              Comment

              • street bully
                Tua's daddy.
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2008
                • 25014
                • 697
                • 263
                • 35,118

                #8
                Originally posted by MAN IN BLACK
                Fight III,

                I believe Vazquez was behind Rafa but no more than 2 points behind going into the 12th IMO. But I'll rewatch to try and see where you guys are coming from. That isn't my entire point, though.


                bully, that 4th, where Vazquez was dropped, Marquez came in looking to hurt him some more and got rocked himself - that's what I'm talking about, Vazquez just had more answers to adversity throughout the series. And those reactions, the fire, the moments of fortitude, fixity of purpose and raw character when up against it is what this series is really defined by, not score-cards. Marquez's shining moment in that regard was making it out of the 3rd in the first fight, when Vazquez went after him with relative caution. When Izzy poured it on him in the 6th of the rematch, Izzy finished up the better man. In the rubber-match, when Izzy poured it on in the 12th, regardless of who you have winning on the cards and by how many points, Izzy came out clearly looking like the better man.


                However you score it in V-M III, and Marquez certainly wasn't dishing out any kind of domination, Vazquez had emerged the better guy and was beating the **** out of Marquez by the 12th. And you guys know it. Izzy knew he had to come up with something big in that round and he delivered it in every regard except the stoppage (which was perilously close for an exhausted and ass-whooped Marquez).




                I want more compelling arguments for Marquez re. the actual substance of these fights, not just the cards. Prove to me that Marquez is the better man.





                I don't set out to discredit Marquez in any way, because, naturally, in a series like this, the Glory is essentially shared.

                But real talking, the way I see it, Izzy's wins, and the manner of them, means significantly more than Marquez'.
                I don't know about being the better man, but Marquez has the better resume. Vazquez finished the third stronger, but I score round by round, and I had Marquez winning.

                Comment

                • Dick Buffman
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 10401
                  • 347
                  • 205
                  • 12,377

                  #9
                  Marquez more or less outclassed him for most of the rounds they fought. The second fight was a bull**** premature stoppage by one of the worst ref's in boxing.

                  And the 3rd fight was pure Rafa domination, although some people feel that Vazquez deserves 6 rounds of credit for putting together a final solid round in which he went for broke, precisely because HE KNEW Rafa was ahead in the fight and he knew he needed a k.o to win.

                  You wanna talk about perseverance as your yardstick, then don't leave out the fact that Rafa was a bantam for pretty much all of his career who moved up to challenge the naturally bigger Vazquez.

                  And still won.

                  Comment

                  • savorduhflavor
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 8194
                    • 288
                    • 59
                    • 14,875

                    #10
                    The substance doesn't matter. The cards do.

                    Marquez won the third fight. You can fall in love with Izzy's valor as much as you want, but he still lost.

                    I can understand how Izzy may have won more people over with his style. But he lost and Marquez is the superior fighter which was proven over the trilogy.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP