Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Vows To Not Budge Further To Mayweather

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jack Napier
    Whores on Our Cul de Sac
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8668
    • 812
    • 424
    • 16,030

    #571
    Pac don't have to chase Floyd
    he is right to not compromise anymore
    let Floyd stay in 2nd place

    Comment

    • Steven Adams
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 2264
      • 99
      • 170
      • 8,996

      #572
      pacman must of just woke up 6months late

      Comment

      • SluggerFan
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 1646
        • 63
        • 91
        • 7,740

        #573
        60-40 to the winner is the only way to do this fight!

        Comment

        • HandSpeed303
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 4793
          • 125
          • 97
          • 22,213

          #574
          It's really sort of sad to see how many so called boxing fans would rather see their fighter with the upperhand in negotiations, than to see the fight itself...

          Really sad...Not surprising though.

          Comment

          • jessie2fast
            Amateur
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Jun 2010
            • 3
            • 0
            • 0
            • 6,217

            #575
            It should be split 45-45 with the winner getting the remaining 10%. Pac draws just as much fans as mayweather, so it's only right that the boxer that wins the match gets paid more

            Comment

            • badass316
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2006
              • 1589
              • 51
              • 0
              • 10,339

              #576
              Originally posted by Big Smoke
              The maximum penalty for being overweight is like 2% of the overall purse or some **** like that.
              Which is why I said some "absurd" number. However my point was that Pacquiao had at least a valid reason to try and demand a stiffer penalty (although it was a bit over the top like I previously mentioned) since PBF recently came in over the agreed upon contractual weight limit in his previous fight. Whereas PBF really doesn't have any reason, except for pure speculation from his often delusional father, to demand OSDT. I can understand asking for the tests against SSM, but not against Pacquiao.

              Originally posted by Big Smoke
              And it's also not the first time OSDT has been demaded (Tyson-Holyfield).
              I'm well aware PBF isn't the first to demand extra testing. But you also have to take into account how long boxing has been around and the number of times such things (extra testing) has ever been demanded, which is hardly ever.

              Comment

              • badass316
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2006
                • 1589
                • 51
                • 0
                • 10,339

                #577
                Originally posted by HandSpeed303
                It's really sort of sad to see how many so called boxing fans would rather see their fighter with the upperhand in negotiations, than to see the fight itself...

                Really sad...Not surprising though.
                I know right... You would think that some of these people are actually getting some sort of piece by how vehemently they try to defend the notion of PBF getting the lion's share of the money. They fail to realize that if PBF does indeed have his way, this fight will most likely never materialize which would deprive the boxing world of a potential historical fight.

                Comment

                • | THE KING |
                  A King of Ones Self
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 4284
                  • 125
                  • 253
                  • 11,451

                  #578
                  Originally posted by badass316
                  Which is why I said some "absurd" number. However my point was that Pacquiao had at least a valid reason to try and demand a stiffer penalty (although it was a bit over the top like I previously mentioned) since PBF recently came in over the agreed upon contractual weight limit in his previous fight. Whereas PBF really doesn't have any reason, except for pure speculation from his often delusional father, to demand OSDT. I can understand asking for the tests against SSM, but not against Pacquiao.
                  Agreed.

                  I don't see what the big deal is with the penalty. As long as Floyd don't cheat the scales he wont have to pay the fine. Same applies to manny. OSDT makes sense for shane because he was an admitted PED user. LOL!

                  Originally posted by badass316
                  I'm well aware PBF isn't the first to demand extra testing. But you also have to take into account how long boxing has been around and the number of times such things (extra testing) has ever been demanded, which is hardly ever.
                  Exactly.

                  Comment

                  • AFighter4U
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 3576
                    • 63
                    • 0
                    • 9,768

                    #579
                    This is rather rare... A polite exchange of level headed ideas.

                    Comment

                    • Shabba Rank$
                      ~Swift~
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 5994
                      • 336
                      • 319
                      • 13,526

                      #580
                      Originally posted by badass316
                      Which is why I said some "absurd" number. However my point was that Pacquiao had at least a valid reason to try and demand a stiffer penalty (although it was a bit over the top like I previously mentioned) since PBF recently came in over the agreed upon contractual weight limit in his previous fight. Whereas PBF really doesn't have any reason, except for pure speculation from his often delusional father, to demand OSDT. I can understand asking for the tests against SSM, but not against Pacquiao.



                      I'm well aware PBF isn't the first to demand extra testing. But you also have to take into account how long boxing has been around and the number of times such things (extra testing) has ever been demanded, which is hardly ever.
                      Roach mentioned that his former boxing fighters Justin Fortune and James Toney were known to have used steroids.

                      Stay updated with exclusive boxing news, fighter rankings, match analysis, and upcoming fight schedules. Your trusted source for professional boxing since 1922

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP