Can anyone answer the question? I mean certainly the so called fighter of the decade should be an overwhelming favorite to beat the semi retired, runner, one punch at a time, no heart, no chin, feather fisted, IRS troubled, almost KO'd by Shane Mosley, Gayweather? Right?
He couldn't even get a 24/7 for his fight with Clottey...LOL...P4P Catchweight King and fighter of the decade.
Though I don't give a sht about the money split...
He's fighter of the decade because of his drastic weight jump, the level of competition he's faced at the higher weights, and he fought for the entire decade, didn't retire and un retire... but who's most likely going to win the fight... Floyd..
seriously who gives a **** who the fighter of the decade is.
On the fact that ONLY a small as group of posters can actually debate intelligently on Floyd PRIOR to the year 2005.
Most of the people in this VERY thread seem to think that Floyd started his career in 2007.
you can't determine whether someone can or can't debate about it. many people don't do it because they simply don't care, and that includes his fans, stans, detractors, haters, etc.
i agree with not many people knowing of his early days, but that happens with most boxers anyway, including floyd and pacquiao
still, more than 2% of the posters know about floyd's career before 2005
Oh you only focused on the purse split part, nevermind why the so called Fighter of the Decade is the underdog hunh? If Pac is greater and better than Floyd then why is he the underdog?
Who says he is the underdog? The fact that Fraud keeps ducking him doesn't sound to me like he's the underdog. Amazing *****s. They're ****** as ever.
He's fighter of the decade because of his drastic weight jump, the level of competition he's faced at the higher weights, and he fought for the entire decade, didn't retire and un retire... but who's most likely going to win the fight... Floyd..
seriously who gives a **** who the fighter of the decade is.
Comment