Sorry mate but based on where reference the general census for P4P is one of two things:
1) It's accomplishment based - ie: how many belts a guy gets or the weight divisions a fighter dominates and basically just how kick ass he is compared to the next guy etc. This seems to be the scale used in many arguments for or against manny or Floyd as P4P no 1.
2) (my preference) scaled skill comparison. Eg if a fighter is scaled up or down in size proportionally could they beat the next guy. the thing to remember here is speed; peeps slow down the bigger they get, footwork drops off, mobility etc which makes it very subjective.
No Ceiling. i respect ya brother but Floyd is MUCH slower than he was back in the day @ a lower weight so your basis for the 168 comparison is big time flawed bro
1) It's accomplishment based - ie: how many belts a guy gets or the weight divisions a fighter dominates and basically just how kick ass he is compared to the next guy etc. This seems to be the scale used in many arguments for or against manny or Floyd as P4P no 1.
2) (my preference) scaled skill comparison. Eg if a fighter is scaled up or down in size proportionally could they beat the next guy. the thing to remember here is speed; peeps slow down the bigger they get, footwork drops off, mobility etc which makes it very subjective.
No Ceiling. i respect ya brother but Floyd is MUCH slower than he was back in the day @ a lower weight so your basis for the 168 comparison is big time flawed bro
Comment