Why is ringside report?

[futureofboxing]

Why is ringside report the only website reporting the alleged deal?

[futureofboxing]

For the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight

[ИATAS]

because they said they spoke to an inside source close to mayweathers camp.

Whether or not that's true who knows.

[mushahadeen]

Why is ringside report the only website reporting the alleged deal?

Because they made it up.

[Mr. Ryan]

I haven't read Ringside Report's report but I've spoken with representatives on both sides of the deal and neither is making comments on the matter.

[Evil Abed]

Because they made it up.

I've looked through most of there articles and checked out the writer.

They seem legit.

[Mr. David]

Of course, that website also had Mike Tyson's return as "confirmed" back in March.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zOniKoEtkBUJ:ringsidereport.com/%3Fp%3D1569+ringsidereport+wrong&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari

[mushahadeen]

Of course, that website also had Mike Tyson's return as "confirmed" back in March.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&client=safari

Dude it's totally plausible that the same website that "confirmed" Mike Tyson's comeback in March would scoop Boxingscene, ESPN, Fox Sports, Ring TV, Fanhouse, etc. on the biggest fight of the century.

[Mr. David]

Dude it's totally plausible that the same website that "confirmed" Mike Tyson's comeback in March would scoop Boxingscene, ESPN, Fox Sports, Ring TV, Fanhouse, etc. on the biggest fight of the century.

And it's also plausible that poor journalistic principles are systemic. But that's okay... the TMZ and the National Enquirer have done some good work in recent years.

I'm just saying... a reputation precedes them.

[Mr. Ryan]

And it's also plausible that poor journalistic principles are systemic. But that's okay... the TMZ and the National Enquirer have done some good work in recent years.

I'm just saying... a reputation precedes them.

He's got a point there.