More Exciting Boxer: Tyson or Pacman?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • $Bullsfam$
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 10252
    • 813
    • 630
    • 46,956

    #21
    Tyson and it's not even close. I don't care if your the biggest Pacman nuthugger on the planet. Their's no way in justifying Pacman over Tyson unless your racist or have some other agenda.

    Mike Tyson was the ****ing man. Nobody was more scary then that mother****er. He was the most badass mother****er in the sport of boxing IMO.

    Comment

    • madsweeney
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 4551
      • 508
      • 298
      • 14,237

      #22
      Depends on who's paying.

      I'd rather pay to see Pacman, the fights were action packed and lasted long enough to enjoy the fight.

      To see a fight for free I'd go with Tyson of course. The energy around the dude was insane. Its just too bad he blew out those bums so quick that it almost seems like a waste of money.

      Comment

      • rocky_balboa23
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 2017
        • 236
        • 226
        • 12,169

        #23
        I may be biased here coz im a big Pac fan but I have to go with Pacquiao. I remember for a Tyson fight, it's exciting only for the first few rounds because you expect a spectacular KO. After 5 rounds it becomes a bit boring especially since Tyson's stamina is not good.

        As for a Pac fight, you expect him to work tirelessly the entire fight.

        Comment

        • Earl-Hickey
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 29031
          • 2,832
          • 1,384
          • 297,750

          #24
          Tyson because of his personality too you never knew what he'd do.

          Comment

          • COYS
            Pride of North London
            • May 2009
            • 655
            • 40
            • 22
            • 7,043

            #25
            Tyson allday, in his peak he could beat people before they got in the ring

            Comment

            • Roy Keane
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 853
              • 31
              • 5
              • 13,639

              #26
              Have to go with tyson, both are exciting, but with tyson you could end up with somthing crazy happening, but with pac-man that wont happen.

              Comment

              • STRUGG
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2010
                • 7457
                • 199
                • 152
                • 7,745

                #27
                mike................................

                Comment

                • BOLLOCKS
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 36266
                  • 1,401
                  • 1,537
                  • 58,925

                  #28
                  Mike Tyson..

                  Comment

                  • Equilibrium
                    Knuckles Up
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 3048
                    • 421
                    • 563
                    • 10,411

                    #29
                    Originally posted by check hook
                    Tyson easily...........he sold out stadiums and did million plus on PPV fighting tomato cans........biggest draw ever if he hadn't lost years in jail........

                    What the **** do pvp buys have to do with how exciting a fighter is? Mayweather is the supposed ppv king, while he is an incredibly talented fighter, his fights in recent years have been boring as hell.



                    On topic. As much as i would like to vote Tyson. I have to go with Pacquiao. The reason is, when Tyson fought guys, you though he would beat the **** out of him, when he first lost to Douglas it came as a surprise.

                    For Pacquiao, when he fought Cotto i didn't know what would happen. To me that is much more exciting than having a pretty good idea of who is going to win.

                    Same thing with Pacquiao vs Mayweather, i'm rooting for Pacquiao, but i honestly have no idea who is going to win.

                    Comment

                    • #1Assassin
                      Conveyor of Truth
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 8019
                      • 647
                      • 264
                      • 20,993

                      #30
                      tyson, u get diffrent stylistic matchups every time.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP