Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LOL -Floyd mayweather Owned Hard By Ring TV

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LOL -Floyd mayweather Owned Hard By Ring TV

    Mayweather better than Ali and Robinson? Ha

    Posted Apr. 23, 2010 at 11:38pm
    By Michael Rosenthal


    When Muhammad Ali said he was The Greatest, you tended to believe him. When Floyd Mayweather Jr. says the same thing, well …

    Mayweather was asked on a conference call a few days ago whether he actually believes what he has said in the past, that he’s a better fighter than were both heavyweight legend Ali and the consensus greatest-ever Sugar Ray Robinson.

    He answered in the affirmative.

    “Why not?,” he said. “I take my hat off to them. I got respect for Sugar Ray Robinson. I've got respect for Muhammad Ali. But I'm a man just like they're men. I put on my pants just like they put on their pants. What makes them any better than I am? Because they fought a thousand fights? In my era, it's totally different. You know? It's pay-per-view now, so things change. It's out with the old and in with the new. Things change. Like I said, Muhammad Ali is one hell of a fighter. But Floyd Mayweather is the best. Sugar Ray Robinson is one hell of a fighter, but Floyd Mayweather is the best.”

    Here’s a quick why not:

    Robinson could do everything Mayweather can – and much more. He had power and wasn’t afraid to use it, as Mayweather seems to be. Robinson actually took risks in order to take out his opponents and entertain the fans. And consider this: He started his career 119-1-2 during an era deep in talent and was still fighting for titles into his 40s. Robinson fought 30-plus fights against Hall of Famers.

    Ali could do everything Mayweather can – at heavyweight. And, although he wasn’t as aggressive as Robinson was, he too went after his opponents more than Mayweather does. Ali dominating the richest era ever in the heavyweight division, fighting 13 times against hall of famers. And he had charisma that Mayweather couldn’t begin to replicate.

    Who has Mayweather beaten? Jose Luis Castillo? Ricky Hatton? An aging Oscar De La Hoya? That doesn't stack against the likes of Jake LaMotta and Kid Gavilan or Sonny Liston and Joe Frazier.

    Make no mistake: Mayweather is a future Hall of Famer and one of the best fighters of his time. To compare him to the likes of Ali and Robinson is ridiculous, however. He needs to prove a lot more before we can even entertain such a concept.









    ^Hey floyd? Instead of sulking, how about learning humility some day:

    Last edited by Vadrigar.; 06-16-2010, 04:35 AM.

  • #2
    *****s where are you?

    Comment


    • #3
      Mayweather doesn't believe that, but if you say others are better than you it kinda takes something away from you.

      Comment


      • #4
        Robinson could do everything Mayweather can – and much more

        i swear robinson had next to no defence

        Comment


        • #5
          Mayweather couldn't carry Robinson's jock strap. That is my opinion.

          Comment


          • #6
            i dnt see any ownage, i see truth. i also doubt floyd even cares.

            to me, boxing matters, but like with all history its relevant only as far as it allows us to see why things are where they are today and where they might go in the future. u cnt live in the past tho. so i watch wats goin on now, and even tho i wish i was there for the golden days, there is still muich to be enjoyd today. and to me, floyd is the best boxer out there rite now, in spite of all of his flaws.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Levesta View Post
              Robinson could do everything Mayweather can – and much more

              i swear robinson had next to no defence
              do you want me to pull that video out again?

              I thought you were too busy with women. (sarcasm)
              Last edited by Vadrigar.; 06-15-2010, 07:32 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                That was like 2 months ago before he fought Shane. Why dig up old ****?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
                  i dnt see any ownage, i see truth. i also doubt floyd even cares.

                  to me, boxing matters, but like with all history its relevant only as far as it allows us to see why things are where they are today and where they might go in the future. u cnt live in the past tho. so i watch wats goin on now, and even tho i wish i was there for the golden days, there is still muich to be enjoyd today. and to me, floyd is the best boxer out there rite now, in spite of all of his flaws.
                  Of course it's the truth.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    these are terrible arguments, though i dont agree with mayweather

                    the simple answer is

                    Sugar Ray Robinson was greater because he was more prolific, he fought over a 100 fights without losing, and over 140 in his career,

                    Ali was the second greatest because he had the character and charisma to match his talent, he was a heavyweight boxer which is naturally a larger draw, but he boxed like a smaller man, using alot of movement and footwork


                    most importantly he was a likeable guy and commanded much more respect


                    As far as skill goes, neither of them really have anything definitively on mayweather, its a matter of opinion

                    Ive been saying this for a while Mayweather is certainly not the greatest boxer, but he probably could be the best boxer

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP