Tweet
Peter should have been disqualified for punching on the back of Suk's head (or whatever his name was).
I think that the KO was mainlystarted by the illegal punching.
I think that the KO was mainlystarted by the illegal punching.
-
Last edited by Nautilus; 07-02-2005, 09:00 PM. -
Sykes was turning his head when Peter threw his punch, not his fault. -
Originally posted by MilkMan
When Suks was leaning downwards, Peters punched on the back of Suks head twice.Comment
-
100% agree with you!Originally posted by MilkMan
Comment
-
Originally posted by MilkMan
It was a deliberate huge punch on the back of Suk's head. The punch ultimately led Suks to stop defending.Comment
-
Thats a ludacris statement.Comment
-
Originally posted by deuskie
ludacris? no!Comment
-
If you are leaning in while the other guy is punching then you are going to get hit in the back of the head. That's Sykes fault.Comment
-
LMAO .... His name aint suks...But that he does...The punch that hurt Sykes is the same punch that Johnson KOed Jones with...So can i say he shoulda been DQed...Behind the ear is where allot of fighteres get KOed from...He should not have been DQed...Sykes kept turning his head...LMAO did u see him bite the rope at the end...lol classic KO He said Peter was gonna be calling him Toby after the fight..LOL thats what he deserved...He has 6 KOs..WTF what heavy wieght with 23-1 record has 6 KOs....i knew it was over when i seen that record...Even Chris Byrd KOs more people than him...Comment
-
no... i meant the two punches behind the head (not behind the ear) that followed after thatOriginally posted by Bad IntentionsComment
Comment