Double Standards Reguarding The Destruction Of GERALD McCLELLAN?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wmute
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2003
    • 8084
    • 289
    • 446
    • 15,158

    #201
    Originally posted by MmuhammadM
    fair enough, but back to ezzard Charles. wasn't he a light heavyweight/heavyweight?
    mw to hw. Generally regarded as the best 175er in the history of the sport.

    Comment

    • Vadrigar.
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 8134
      • 517
      • 415
      • 20,350

      #202
      Originally posted by wmute
      mw to hw. Generally regarded as the best 175er in the history of the sport.
      Who do you think was the best 140ib of all time?

      Comment

      • wmute
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2003
        • 8084
        • 289
        • 446
        • 15,158

        #203
        Originally posted by MmuhammadM
        Who do you think was the best 140ib of all time?
        the most accomplished at 140, the most accomplished fighter among those who also fought at 140 at some point in their career, or the one I would never bet against?

        It's a very tough question in any case, some great fighters who could have fought at 140 entirely skipped the division (Armstrong, Napoles, Duran), or fought only one title fight at the weight (Whitaker, Mayweather)

        Except Armstrong, I feel that the other guys I mentioned would have probably been at their absolute best at 140, but they hardly ever fought there.

        I would have a hard time picking Loi, Locche, Pryor, Chavez, Zoo against those mentioned above, but they all had deeper resumes at 140.

        Benitez is also hard to rank as a 140 fighter.

        I would say that Canzoneri and Ross might be the ones to look at, because they rank high as ATG's and they did spend some time at 140.

        Comment

        • Vadrigar.
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 8134
          • 517
          • 415
          • 20,350

          #204
          Originally posted by wmute
          the most accomplished at 140, the most accomplished fighter among those who also fought at 140 at some point in their career, or the one I would never bet against?

          It's a very tough question in any case, some great fighters who could have fought at 140 entirely skipped the division (Armstrong, Napoles, Duran), or fought only one title fight at the weight (Whitaker, Mayweather)

          Except Armstrong, I feel that the other guys I mentioned would have probably been at their absolute best at 140, but they hardly ever fought there.

          I would have a hard time picking Loi, Locche, Pryor, Chavez, Zoo against those mentioned above, but they all had deeper resumes at 140.

          Benitez is also hard to rank as a 140 fighter.



          I would say that Canzoneri and Ross might be the ones to look at, because they rank high as ATG's and they did spend some time at 140.
          I have a hard time picking anyone over Sugar Ray Leonard as an example to use. He is in top 10 p4p, so I don't see what's the problem. He didn't duck Thomas Hearns either. That's what I liked about him.
          Last edited by Vadrigar.; 06-19-2010, 11:30 AM.

          Comment

          • wmute
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2003
            • 8084
            • 289
            • 446
            • 15,158

            #205
            Originally posted by MmuhammadM
            I have a hard time picking anyone over Sugar Ray Leonard as an example to use. He is in top 10 p4p, so I don't see what's the problem. He didn't duck Thomas Hearns either. That's what I liked about him.
            you asked about 140, right? Then why would you talk about Leonard or Hearns?

            That being said, I find it hilarious that anyone would use Ray Leonard as example of a "braveheart", but go ahead... One day you will know more about the sport in general and Ray Leonard in particular, look back, and laugh if you remember what you wrote.

            Comment

            • Vadrigar.
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 8134
              • 517
              • 415
              • 20,350

              #206
              Originally posted by wmute
              you asked about 140, right? Then why would you talk about Leonard or Hearns?

              That being said, I find it hilarious that anyone would use Ray Leonard as example of a "braveheart", but go ahead... One day you will know more about the sport in general and Ray Leonard in particular, look back, and laugh if you remember what you wrote.
              Is pernell whitaker more of a brave heart than Ray Leonard?

              Comment

              • wmute
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2003
                • 8084
                • 289
                • 446
                • 15,158

                #207
                Originally posted by MmuhammadM
                Is pernell whitaker more of a brave heart than Ray Leonard?
                I already answered the same question. Let me reiterate one *LAST* time on everything I have to say on the topic.

                1a) There is a rather large body of evidence hinting at Ray being a business man, more than a "brave heart". I am not going to dwell on this further. Get some info for yourself, if you don't buy into it.

                1b) There is no evidence of Pea not being a "brave heart"

                2) With 1a) and 1b) in mind, let's also point out that there is no way of knowing how Pea would have behaved if he had Leonard's star power and money making ability (and vice versa).

                3) I have my respect for Leonard (or Mayweather Jr. for the matter ) completely intact. It's their job, and most ppl like to make as much money as possible with their jobs. Being a "brave heart" is however "different", and does not look like Leonard (or Mayweather Jr.).

                FINALLY) I have one question, too. Why do you keep asking about 140 and then talking about Leonard? Leonard never fought at the weight, and he has been criticized, right or wrong, for not fighting the best 140 fighter available when he was at 147, so... how could he be a good example?

                Comment

                • Vadrigar.
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 8134
                  • 517
                  • 415
                  • 20,350

                  #208
                  Originally posted by wmute
                  I already answered the same question. Let me reiterate one *LAST* time on everything I have to say on the topic.

                  1a) There is a rather large body of evidence hinting at Ray being a business man, more than a "brave heart". I am not going to dwell on this further. Get some info for yourself, if you don't buy into it.

                  1b) There is no evidence of Pea not being a "brave heart"

                  2) With 1a) and 1b) in mind, let's also point out that there is no way of knowing how Pea would have behaved if he had Leonard's star power and money making ability (and vice versa).

                  3) I have my respect for Leonard (or Mayweather Jr. for the matter ) completely intact. It's their job, and most ppl like to make as much money as possible with their jobs. Being a "brave heart" is however "different", and does not look like Leonard (or Mayweather Jr.).

                  FINALLY) I have one question, too. Why do you keep asking about 140 and then talking about Leonard? Leonard never fought at the weight, and he has been criticized, right or wrong, for not fighting the best 140 fighter available when he was at 147, so... how could he be a good example?
                  Yes you are right, leonard never fought at the weight, I shouldn't be using him as a good example.

                  Actually I don't think anyone in 140 can be used as a good example. If you talk about classic fighters, then there's not really enough known about them to make an informed judgement. It's hard to know much about the boxing politics at the time.

                  That's why I prefer to use modern fighters as a good example.

                  Comment

                  • Vadrigar.
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 8134
                    • 517
                    • 415
                    • 20,350

                    #209
                    Originally posted by Frank Ducketts
                    Gerald was he victim of rabbit punching, and a terrible ref who allowed that **** to happen...
                    was that referee ever punished?

                    Comment

                    • Grand Champ
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 12782
                      • 968
                      • 1,313
                      • 23,079

                      #210
                      Good point with the quitter nickname. Its likely true, we want these fighters to give it all and doesn't think of the consequences. Like when people said **** about Cotto after the Marg fight. Most people who called fighters a quitter haven't really laced up themself.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP