And Bernard Hopkins and Sugar Ray Leonard said Floyd was the best of this era. Yadayadayada.
What do you think? Where do you rate Pacquiao as an ATG?
am just curious, so how do u rate pacquiao?
hope u wont copy check hook's answer.
dont ask me too. i dont know the answer, u probly know the answer coz u seem to ask them to expose their knowledge. so i want to expose how deep u know on boxing.
How am I ducking you when you conceded to your defeat not once, but TWICE...
You're just obsessed..
turning off my computer now.. I hope you don't stay up and wait for me to relog back on in about 10 hours.. I know, it's probably killing you that you won't have my attention for another 10 hours..
dont ask me too. i dont know the answer, u probly know the answer coz u seem to ask them to expose their knowledge. so i want to expose how deep u know on boxing.
I rate Pacquiao in the 20s and Floyd in the 30s or 40s.
I dont see any answer from Check-hook nor do i understand why i would want to copy another mans opinion.
If you are looking for a breakdown regarding each place on my ATG list you wont get it. Im not looking to spend hours breaking it down.
My knowledge about boxing is OK but i wouldnt call it "deep" as in jrosales or other great posters on this site, so there is no need to quiz me.
I am however unbiased and logical. Something *******s fail to be.
it's arguable, people seriously overate past fighters, not realising the amount of excuses that could also be used for just about all of their big wins, guy overtrained, not training, old, weight drained etc
Roy used to be ranked as the #1 GOAT back when he was still ruling the prp charts
How am I ducking you when you conceded to your defeat not once, but TWICE...
You're just obsessed..
turning off my computer now.. I hope you don't stay up and wait for me to relog back on in about 10 hours.. I know, it's probably killing you that you won't have my attention for another 10 hours..
run away...............you prefer to flame and troll............
it's arguable, people seriously overate past fighters, not realising the amount of excuses that could also be used for just about all of their big wins, guy overtrained, not training, old, weight drained etc
Roy used to be ranked as the #1 GOAT back when he was still ruling the prp charts
I rate Pacquiao in the 20s and Floyd in the 30s or 40s.
I dont see any answer from Check-hook nor do i understand why i would want to copy another mans opinion.
If you are looking for a breakdown regarding each place on my ATG list you wont get it. Im not looking to spend hours breaking it down.
My knowledge about boxing is OK but i wouldnt call it "deep" as in jrosales or other great posters on this site, so there is no need to quiz me.
I am however unbiased and logical. Something *******s fail to be.
ok. i mentioned check hook, coz i asked him first.
so, pac is ahead with floyd that big?
anyway, i cant contest that coz honestly i dont know the other old fighters (i aint boxing historian). just know some by names and through watching old dvds.
Comment