they say there is no difference...

[BOLLOCKS]

even if a different person wrapped them.. is there any reason why one should be cracked?

It ripped a bit, big whoop.

[BOLLOCKS]

marg is cotto's papi.

fact.

True Story..

[Sin City]

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=394933




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^



****ing moron


Wait does Ortiz use plaster as well because after his fight against Hector Alatorre he had the same look in his wraps .

LOL just goes to show you don't know how to read... I said the stain was on there BEFORE the fight ever HAPPENED, not AFTER. There is no reason why a wrap should have stains before if there hasn't been any contact. You = Fail.

&& If Nevada's checking of wraps was foul proof.. then the tampered gloves wouldn't of got past them during the Mosley bout, and they did.. Brother Naz had to say something for them to realise it.

[Left Hook Tua]

did marg cheat against cotto? yes? no? maybe?

did marg whoop cotto's ass? definitely.

[Sin City]

It ripped a bit, big whoop.

a rip and a crack are wayy different. again, I don't understand how people can be so blind to the facts when they are right infront of them.

[MONEYMAY-]

LOL just goes to show you don't know how to read... I said the stain was on there BEFORE the fight ever HAPPENED, not AFTER. There is no reason why a wrap should have stains before if there hasn't been any contact. You = Fail.

&& If Nevada's checking of wraps was foul proof.. then the tampered gloves wouldn't of got past them during the Mosley bout, and they did.. Brother Naz had to say something for them to realise it.

Are you a ****ing moron? Read the whole damm article before you start talking ****. You fail for not realizing that a respected New York Post writer clearly states Margarito was clean for the Cotto fight.


Who's more right?

A professional NEW YORK POST writer or you?

[MONEYMAY-]

]a rip and a crack are wayy different. again, I don't understand how people can be so blind to the facts when they are right infront of them.[/B]

Like you ignored my entire reply and article posted in it?

[Eaner0919]

LOL just goes to show you don't know how to read... I said the stain was on there BEFORE the fight ever HAPPENED, not AFTER. There is no reason why a wrap should have stains before if there hasn't been any contact. You = Fail.

&& If Nevada's checking of wraps was foul proof.. then the tampered gloves wouldn't of got past them during the Mosley bout, and they did.. Brother Naz had to say something for them to realise it.

so let me get this clear

are you saying that the stain, was also there prior to the fight for Cotto?

and I thought the Mosley fight was in California and you clearly state:

"&& If Nevada's checking of wraps was foul proof.. then the tampered gloves wouldn't of got past them during the Mosley bout, and they did.. Brother Naz had to say something for them to realise it."

can you explain please? Thanks

[Vasyl’s dad]

LOL just goes to show you don't know how to read... I said the stain was on there BEFORE the fight ever HAPPENED, not AFTER. There is no reason why a wrap should have stains before if there hasn't been any contact. You = Fail.

&& If Nevada's checking of wraps was foul proof.. then the tampered gloves wouldn't of got past them during the Mosley bout, and they did.. Brother Naz had to say something for them to realise it.

The Mosley fight was in CA though.

*Turkish looks over to Tommy after Tommy fires his empty gun*

"oops"

[Dan...]

did marg cheat against cotto? yes? no? maybe?

did marg whoop cotto's ass? definitely.

Your post pretty much makes the point.

How legit can that win be? There has to be MASSIVE doubt over that fight and its fairness now. Is it really logical to think that it was this one-off fight against Mosley that Margarito was using these special wraps for? Personally I think that is a little naive. I agree that it cannot be established with certainty that he cheated in the Cotto fight, but I think there is plenty of doubt over it. Enough for that win to pretty much be discounted.