Prince Naseem Hamed vs Marquez/Morales/Pacquiao/ @ 126lbs

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • edgarg
    Honest BoxingScene posts
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2004
    • 11045
    • 547
    • 54
    • 39,228

    #11
    Originally posted by crazyboy867
    naseem hamed vs marquez, morales, pacquiao would have been amazing to see.
    if nas ever fought any of the 3 fighters i think he would probably lose to all 3 of them and most likely get KO by pac and morales and lose a UD to marquez just like how he lost to barrera...

    who do you think nas had the best chance of winning against marquez, morales or pacquiao.
    He lost to Barrera because he didn't take it seriously. He hardly ever trained more than a few weeks. I'm assuming a dedicated, finely trained, fit Hamed, I believe he would beat them all, probably KO all but maybe Morales. And I say "maybe", since he had ferocious power, probably the best of any featherweight in history.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #12
      On form, he could beat all of them.

      I think he KOs a featherweight Pacquiao. Thats actually the one im most confident about. If he could drag Morales into a shoot out, which happened a lot, he could knock him out. JMM, as a counter puncher, is the worst one stylistically for Naz but he can be dropped/hurt too.

      Comment

      • Left Hook Tua
        VATNIK
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 62306
        • 7,010
        • 1,581
        • 951,318

        #13
        Originally posted by johncods
        Marquez would school naz worst than barrera did.
        lmao

        1. barrera is better than marquez. way better.

        2. marquez is a chinny ****. hamed hits harder than pacquiao at 126. he would not only drop marquez like pacquiao did but he would knock him the fuck out.

        3. school? lol i love how every win is a "schooling" now. barrera beat him decisively but it wasn't a complete blowout like people think or talk like it was. just because he couldn't beat barrera , doesn't mean he wasn't a great fighter.

        Comment

        • Left Hook Tua
          VATNIK
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 62306
          • 7,010
          • 1,581
          • 951,318

          #14
          Originally posted by Gutz
          you dont watch boxing much do you ....
          122-126 pacquiao is not the same as 130-140 pacquiao.

          hamed could catch pacquiao coming in wild.

          hamed had very good speed and much more powerful.

          126 pacquiao can beat hamed by late tko or ud. if it's a ko though , good chance it'll be hamed who wins.

          Comment

          • edgarg
            Honest BoxingScene posts
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2004
            • 11045
            • 547
            • 54
            • 39,228

            #15
            Originally posted by edgarg
            He lost to Barrera because he didn't take it seriously. He hardly ever trained more than a few weeks. I'm assuming a dedicated, finely trained, fit Hamed, I believe he would beat them all, probably KO all but maybe Morales. And I say "maybe", since he had ferocious power, probably the best of any featherweight in history.
            Have you guys ever seen a "prime" Hamed fight? He had the most deceptive reach I've ever seen on a boxer, except for Roy Jones. His speed in getting his gloves to meet his opponent's chin took almost all by surprise. And his very unorthodox style "switching" from right to left hander, meant that, when he threw as a right hander, he remained there, but as a left hander, being right under the guys nose, so-to-speak- and well within belting distance of his chin, with his new hitting fist, that is, if he needed to be.

            So a motivated, fit, Hamed, would have lots of opportunities to land on these 3, and I can't see him losing.

            Comment

            • B.U.R.N.E.R
              ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 30197
              • 1,346
              • 400
              • 47,475

              #16
              He beats all of them except Marquez.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP