As usual *****s don't know how to count.......LOL! 2010 is not part of the past decade.....a Pac loss against Floyd has no bearing on the award........LMAO!!!
To be honest, that award only means something to you guys (Pac fanatics). I'm happy for Pac, he's a good fighter.
But in reality I just care about what happens in the ring, awards and all the hype are kinda like a females thing.
Floyd is all about shyttin on the other guy, I understand that about him. He has the me against the world attitude, that's what drives him. Awards and things like that are cool, but to beat the guy who has it is better to him.
Its all about proving them wrong, and he does it well.
Why do you think Floyd didn't. Want Shanes belt?
So be happy for Pac, he did good. But in reality Floyd is better, we all know that. Pac is entertaining, we all know this also. The award is really for the most entertaining fighter not the best fighter. And Pac is that, just not the best.
still laughing..sorry. So i guess the award should state "Most entertaining fighter of the decade"..WTF...If it was Floyd winning this award, then the award would carry more weight right?
Oh, and Floyd does give a ****, and you know this.
The 2000s was the decade that started on January 1, 2000 and ended on December 31, 2009. It was the decade in which the 21st century and 3rd millennium began.
still laughing..sorry. So i guess the award should state "Most entertaining fighter of the decade"..WTF...If it was Floyd winning this award, then the award would carry more weight right?
Oh, and Floyd does give a ****, and you know this.
Nope, didn't care when he won fighter of the year. Awards are cool, but the fights still go on. And yes it should be named "Most Entertaining" cause you know Floyd is an all around better fighter. So to me that means more......
Id rather beat the man than win the award, and you know in your heart Manny only has a punchers chance against Floyd. That's why you guys make threads asking "what if Manny lands flush on Floyd" not "Manny will outbox or technically destroy Floyd." We know who's better.
but to be honest if floyd beats manny that makes him look even better...beating the fighter of the decade is a great accomplishment and will greatly raise floyds status..top 20 atg easy
Floyd already lost by asking for OSDT. That alone make Floyd a coward, real fighter don't accuse other.
Nope, didn't care when he won fighter of the year. Awards are cool, but the fights still go on. And yes it should be named "Most Entertaining" cause you know Floyd is an all around better fighter. So to me that means more......
Id rather beat the man than win the award, and you know in your heart Manny only has a punchers chance against Floyd. That's why you guys make threads asking "what if Manny lands flush on Floyd" not "Manny will outbox or technically destroy Floyd." We know who's better.
First off, never made a thread about any of this nonsense, because it's all irrelevant until the fight if it happens is over.
I can care less about awards personally, but i won't discredit the fact by adding how much better someone else is. With that logic, it seems you do care who won the award.
As far as having a "Punchers Chance"..well welcome to the world of Boxing. Any Boxing fan with a little knowledge of the sport can clearly see that Floyd is the more skilled fighter when it comes to all around technique. This is not what only matters in a Boxing match, sometimes a "Fight" breaks out.
I hope your not one of those guys that if MAnny happens to win, you will just say he was lucky, or his punchers chance is what gave him the win.
again, welcome to Boxing, where there is punching involved.
Comment