Ive noticed alot of people keep dropping Lamont Petersons name whenever an opponent for Khan is mentioned. Lamont Peterson from the little I know about him was an undefeated JWW until lost to Timothy Bradley, Has never been a world champion, Apparently sparred with Mayweather Jr, Yet people go on about Lamont Peterson.
To be he is just another Salita like charachter, An undefeated padded record, Never been a world champion, Sparred with Zab Judah, And then lost his undefeated record in the first round to Khan.
Yet you dont see Khan fans dropping Salitas name everytime Bradley or Alexander is mentioned. These undefeated hypejobs exist, They get exposed when they step up to world class.
So the Lamont Peterson apologists please tell me what is so great about Peterson?
To be he is just another Salita like charachter, An undefeated padded record, Never been a world champion, Sparred with Zab Judah, And then lost his undefeated record in the first round to Khan.
Yet you dont see Khan fans dropping Salitas name everytime Bradley or Alexander is mentioned. These undefeated hypejobs exist, They get exposed when they step up to world class.
So the Lamont Peterson apologists please tell me what is so great about Peterson?

Comment