Was Pacquiao in his prime for the 2nd and 3rd Morales fights?

**-drebin-** · 06-02-2010, 09:14 AM

He hadn't fully developed his skill set, so not exactly.

**Bring It On** · 06-02-2010, 09:16 AM

No, he wasn't. Not even according to *****s, who usually claims that he started using PEDs prior to the Diaz-fight.

**-Huey-** · 06-02-2010, 09:17 AM

Theres no telling...alot of people say prime years are 25-35 and others argue it 25-30. I say Pac was entering his prime when he faced Morales even in their first fight, Pac was already using both hands instead of just one. But then in their 2nd fight it all came together and he got the stoppage win, the 3rd fight was not even a fight it was just a wipe out.

**led** · 06-02-2010, 09:22 AM

pac is shot already

even his win against 1st barrera fight is also a fluke. :|

**Mayabang** · 06-02-2010, 09:26 AM

Originally posted by Chups

Some posters think he was.

Hell he wasn't even prime in the first fight.

Has Pacquiao peaked yet? When is his prime?

hehe, I see what you did there.

**Chups** · 06-02-2010, 10:19 AM

Burner sells more hotcakes than me.

**Shattered Jaw** · 06-02-2010, 10:20 AM

Pac only started taking the A-side meth after the second Marquez fight so he wasn't prime until then.

**lfc19titles** · 06-02-2010, 10:23 AM

no way, pac was still green in those fights. From Oscar/Diaz it was when his prime hit and manny went onto another level

he was at around 70-80 percent against moralis and marquez imo

**RimmyDelicious** · 06-02-2010, 10:25 AM

Nope, he's prime right now.

Just wait, if/when Manny beats Floyd, *****s will cry and between the tears and the sobs there will be whimpers of "Floyd was past it!".

Was Pacquiao in his prime for the 2nd and 3rd Morales fights?