prime torres v.s. Valero at 140......who takes it???

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • STRUGG
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 7457
    • 199
    • 152
    • 7,745

    #1

    prime torres v.s. Valero at 140......who takes it???

    i got torres.......better skilled..............better chin...........who you got....poll to follow
    4
    Ricardo Torres
    75.00%
    3
    Edwin Valero
    25.00%
    1
  • cooper5
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 15053
    • 3,111
    • 6,413
    • 24,486

    #2
    We seen Torres in with some top fighers so he's a known commodity. With Valero we haven't had the opporunity to see him tested yet.

    Comment

    • STRUGG
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2010
      • 7457
      • 199
      • 152
      • 7,745

      #3
      Originally posted by cooper5
      We seen Torres in with some top fighers so he's a known commodity. With Valero we haven't had the opporunity to see him tested yet.
      great point........he was still unproven at 140............this thread sucks......................lol

      Comment

      • Dick Buffman
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 10401
        • 347
        • 205
        • 12,377

        #4
        Anyone who brings skill into this fight as an argument doesn't know **** about boxing.

        If you matched these two it wouldn't be about skill and they wouldn't approach it that way either.

        Leave that to ***** ****s from Michigan to do that ****.

        These dudes would go out and **** it out and prove who is ooozing more machismo.

        At 40' I'd lean towards Torres. But Valero is a beast w/ mad skills that go unnoticed by the novices on here.

        Toss em' up fight and definite FOTY ish...

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP