Why does Freddie Roach discredit all of Pacquiao's opponents?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Russian Crushin
    atheist with a gun
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 33788
    • 1,472
    • 836
    • 46,625

    #11
    After the fight is done with, every fault Roach pointed out was exposed so i dont understand why its discrediting them....if the fighters beat Pac, then its discrediting

    Comment

    • The Gambler1981
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 25961
      • 521
      • 774
      • 49,039

      #12
      I have never understood it either, because some of the things he said were after the fight way after the trash talking had been done.

      Comment

      • silnt_assn_009
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 13
        • 2
        • 0
        • 6,030

        #13
        That's what I think also! He's like Phil Jackson of Boxing Trainers!

        Comment

        • _original_
          Dinamita
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 17838
          • 1,874
          • 789
          • 67,167

          #14
          Originally posted by yevskiy426
          He doesnt discredit them, he points out thier faults, which is what every fighter does. When he get interviewed, what is he suppose to say? Pacs opponent is perfect and has no faults?

          Roach isn't the one lacing up the gloves and going in there and getting the victory, it's Pacquiao...Pac fans can't get mad when he's called overrated then, because his own trainer is saying he's fighting shot and overrated fighters....Pac should tell him to keep his mouth shut, but I forget who I'm talking about....Pac is use to being a puppet to everybody....if it's not Arum it's Roach or BuBoy or it's Ariza or whoever is in his head at the time pulling his strings

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP