Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So, it was Team Mayweather who spread the LIES about the fake emails...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Alibata View Post
    dude wanna talk about proof now.. this whole fiasco is based on proof isn't it? Paranoia = proof. Any ***** argument about proof is just hypocritical. Why need proof when you have infectious paranoia.
    All I asked for was proof that it was Team Mayweather dude, dayum.... but as far as proof in Mannys case, I like most thinking people don't need to be smashed in the head with a brick to prove it hurts. I've seen Mannys change in a short span of time, and so have you. This change can be one of two things, I'm sure you'll agree.

    1. He's taking something now.
    2. God has seen fit to bless Manny in his last years as a fighter.

    One can be proven by proving the other wrong, is that logical?

    Comment


    • #32
      The Mayweather public persona that earned him huge amount of money might also be used to pay-off the end result.

      Karma is a *****...

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by cixthree View Post
        All I asked for was proof that it was Team Mayweather dude, dayum.... but as far as proof in Mannys case, I like most thinking people don't need to be smashed in the head with a brick to prove it hurts. I've seen Mannys change in a short span of time, and so have you. This change can be one of two things, I'm sure you'll agree.

        1. He's taking something now.
        2. God has seen fit to bless Manny in his last years as a fighter.

        One can be proven by proving the other wrong, is that logical?
        IMm not a lawyer but the question about why Tim Smith was not sued is a good question.

        Every newspaper article and tv news story comes from a source. From what ive seen in the past if a news outlet prints something about someone that is not true they usually gets sued along with the source if they gave it up and they usually have to print some kind of retraction. Well the Daily News nor Tim smith has been sued and no retraction has been printed.

        Who has more money? Floyd or the NY Daily News? If you know you are right wouldnt you sue both and if not both definitely the daily news. Wouldnt you ask for some kind of retraction for throwing dirt on my name. I would but they havent. Now that doesnt mean the emails exist but people should question that.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by SuckaPunch View Post
          I'm still waiting for the emails to be released.

          This would've been big news (if it was true) but no other journalists jumped on it except for Atlas and Smith.
          Tim Smith is pretty credible if you ask me. It's hard to ask for more journalists when you have Tim Smith reporting it.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Jack Burton View Post
            Why would he be sued?? He isn't the originator of the lies, he's just the reporter.

            Unless he knew in advance they were lies and he ran with it anyway.

            You're gonna spend 100 pages defending this **** aren't you?

            Putz..
            If you are a real journalist you are suppose to fact check your ****, and your editor is suppose to also check because if you print false **** as news you open yourself up for lawsuit not to mention it damages their credibility.

            Has Tim Smith apologized for the story? If he/they know it to be untrue they would retract and apologize. Have they done that?


            Putz............

            Comment


            • #36
              I there ever was an email it would have been unofficially leaked by now, especially because team Mayweather is getting sued.

              This is boxings version of McCarthyism.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by cixthree View Post
                All I asked for was proof that it was Team Mayweather dude, dayum.... but as far as proof in Mannys case, I like most thinking people don't need to be smashed in the head with a brick to prove it hurts. I've seen Mannys change in a short span of time, and so have you. This change can be one of two things, I'm sure you'll agree.

                1. He's taking something now.
                2. God has seen fit to bless Manny in his last years as a fighter.

                One can be proven by proving the other wrong, is that logical?
                Name mannys change *****. I'm curious to your answer.

                Comment


                • #38
                  liar:

                  Manny <<<<< Floyd

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP