winner take all

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • peekabooboxing
    Banned
    • May 2010
    • 278
    • 9
    • 0
    • 325

    #1

    winner take all

    let the loser get nothing
    the winner gets everything

    mayweather vs pcquiao

    theres more at stake

    if mosley mayweather was winner take all mosley
    would not have been cruising from round 2 onwards
    i think he was happy with the millions
    mayweather kept reminding him of
    so he took it easy ....

    winner take all. so whoever loses gets nothing
  • MONEYMAY-
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 1258
    • 73
    • 34
    • 1,529

    #2
    You could've just said this in the million of Pac vs. Floyd threads instead of making a topic....



    I'm just sayin....

    Comment

    • Shattered Jaw
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 5131
      • 261
      • 141
      • 11,649

      #3
      No.

      Just no.

      Comment

      • peekabooboxing
        Banned
        • May 2010
        • 278
        • 9
        • 0
        • 325

        #4
        You could've just said this in the million of Pac vs. Floyd threads instead of making a topic....



        I'm just sayin....


        ok

        Comment

        • cupocity303
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2005
          • 9604
          • 752
          • 750
          • 22,038

          #5
          Sounds like a good idea.

          Also I remember Floyd once saying that he was willing to bet his entire bank account that he will beat Delahoya but that Oscar was too chicken **** to do the same.

          So I wonder if he would agree to this if someone proposed it. I don't know about Pacquiao at all though.

          Comment

          • Thread Stealer
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 9657
            • 439
            • 102
            • 17,804

            #6
            No fighter would ever in reality sign the contract for this type of fight with this type of money at stake.

            If a fighter was that crazy to do it, his management would talk him out of it.

            Anyone who actually believes this could actually happen needs to get out of their fantasy world and into the real world.

            Comment

            • peekabooboxing
              Banned
              • May 2010
              • 278
              • 9
              • 0
              • 325

              #7
              the good thing about something like this is it prevents
              a fighter just cruising to pick up the check

              maybe winner take all is extreme. how about the winner gets
              25 % of the losers purse ?

              too many fighters cruise because they know whether they fight
              hard or not they're getting paid the same ....

              Comment

              • mushahadeen
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 7964
                • 384
                • 321
                • 8,800

                #8
                Originally posted by peekabooboxing
                winner take all
                Ironically that is also a title of gay **** starring Paulie Malignaggi.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP