Pacman or Floyd: Who Done Better for Boxing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SlickTurtle
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 503
    • 67
    • 59
    • 6,846

    #11
    Originally posted by lfc19titles
    pacman, he has single handedly bought boxing back to another level with his entertaining yet world class boxing style. i know he has done wonders for the uk. without question manny. all sports are about entertaining the fans
    This.

    Comment

    • SoldierWarrior
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 3804
      • 86
      • 113
      • 10,191

      #12
      Floyd because he takes on the best fighters at the best times of their careers.

      Comment

      • Alibata
        Dugong Maharlika
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2004
        • 9047
        • 280
        • 33
        • 16,053

        #13
        Originally posted by omarinbox
        Ouch! I didn't think this poll would turn out a joke.

        One argument supporting Manny and he's a mile ahead.

        PBF fans outnumbered!
        That phenomenon is not just a BS one... More people support Manny period.

        Comment

        • Boxingholic
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 1004
          • 38
          • 0
          • 7,174

          #14
          Originally posted by Da Prince
          Floyd


          He runs his mouth. He markets himself better. And he's never been beat
          He markets himself better, but spends a crap load of money doing it. Ask Schaefer who expect 3M PPV buy for Mosley/Mayweather fight and it only made over 1M. It was a total failure for what they had spent on ads alone!!!

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP