Comments Thread For: Juan Diaz Focused on The Law, and Juan Manuel Marquez

[IIG]

I used to be a huge Juan Diaz fan, but I've been disappointed in his recent performances. He let Nate do whatever he wanted, Marquez made him his *****, and Malignaggi was the ring general in both fights, which shouldn't have been the case at all. Still, Juan seems like a real good dude, and I wish him well in and outside of the ring.

[Dick Buffman]

Juan Diaz is a moron and should learn about the 10th ********* before he pops off about what rights the states have.

I will thoroughly enjoy watching Dinamita knocking his ass out brutally again.

[Drunken Cat]

It's funny how a couple of comments on Arizona's instutionalization of overt racism gets the right-wing ******* psychopaths of the board so up in arms.

[Dick Buffman]

It's funny how a couple of comments on Arizona's instutionalization of overt racism gets the right-wing ******* psychopaths of the board so up in arms.

I'll assume that was directed at me.

There is nothing institutionally racist about the new law, which is basically a states carbon copy of the federal law, which the feds refuse to enforce.

If that makes me a "right wing ******* psychopath" then so be it.

Under the constitution of the U.S the states have all the power, not the feds, so its natural for them to do what they feel is necessary when the feds abstain from doing their job.

[Drunken Cat]

I'll assume that was directed at me.

There is nothing institutionally racist about the new law, which is basically a states carbon copy of the federal law, which the feds refuse to enforce.

If that makes me a "right wing ******* psychopath" then so be it.

Under the constitution of the U.S the states have all the power, not the feds, so its natural for them to do what they feel is necessary when the feds abstain from doing their job.

I guess you could call it profiling on my part. Funny thing, that.

And has anyone ever told you that 'States Rights' was all about slavery?

But yeah, I see your point. There's nothing wrong with cops harassing people for not being white, and there's absolutely nothing institutionally racist about laws compelling them to do so. My mistake.

[Dick Buffman]

I guess you could call it profiling on my part. Funny thing that, actually.

And has anyone ever told you that 'States Rights' was all about slavery?

But yeah, I see your point. There's nothing wrong with cops harassing people for not being white, and there's absolutely nothing institutionally racist about laws compelling them to do so. My mistake.

There's nothing wrong with enforcing immigration law. Especially when its obvious that the people coming over the border are Mexican.

Seems like common sense, not racism.

Unless you think they should be on the lookout for Russians with blue eyes pouring through the Mexican borders.

Think about it.

States rights is about maintaining the integrity and independence of the union. States are given that power precisely to be able to combat a potentially out of control federal government. Which is what we have now and its good to see states exercising their power and sovereignty.

[IIG]

Wow, this is why we shouldn't venture off into other areas outside of boxing. Anyone that defends the indefensible has to be put on ignore.

[switchsouthpaw]

As tough as Juan Diaz is in the ring, you can bet that the former, two-time lightweight titlist would be equally as dogged in a courtroom. [Click Here To Read More]

Gotta respect this kid, fighting the good fight armed with an education.

[switchsouthpaw]

I'll assume that was directed at me.

There is nothing institutionally racist about the new law, which is basically a states carbon copy of the federal law, which the feds refuse to enforce.

If that makes me a "right wing ******* psychopath" then so be it.

Under the constitution of the U.S the states have all the power, not the feds, so its natural for them to do what they feel is necessary when the feds abstain from doing their job.

So that would make you a federalist/constructionist/ideologue/Libertarian?

The states have a right to enforce security of their borders however, this law oversteps those boundaries by painting the entire latino community(which I'm not a member of FYI) as outside of the definition of what ************* perceive as being "American". This is nothing more than an attempt to preserve their definition of "American culture". I mean this is the same state that voted down honoring Martin Luther King, the **** apparently doesn't fall far from the bat...Rand Paul anyone.

FYI-- The constitution was meant to evolve as all things naturally evolve with time, it is only interpreted as being the end all be all by **********s and Libertarians.

[ShoulderRoll]

Why was that college student singled out and taken to prison? Only because of her skin color. If Hispanics or dark skinned people are going to be disproportionately affected by the law then it's unfair.

And I too remember that Arizona didn't want to approve of the MLK Jr. holiday. So it does seem like a little racism is at play in that state.