Should boxing just have 1 belt per division?

[Portman]

no because then the best boxers wouldnt get the shot. for example if someone like mayweather was the only champ, top boxers like margo, cotto, prime mosley and so on would never get a shot at the belt due to him avoiding the dangerous guys till its the right time to fight them when they are over the hill.

This is exactly the point, you WOULDN'T be able to duck them because they would have they would be mandatory challengers for the title. Otherwise they would just take the belt if the fighter refused to fight the challengers and the fighter would be exposed as a ducker.

[NECK SNAPPER]

Their should be one world champion the rest are regional belts

[siablo14]

Man there are billions of different belts people are able to win. If it was up to me they would get rid of all of em and just have ONE belt. Cuz man it gets confusing and 90% of the fighters are CHAMPIONS ...... Ive had casual fans tell me that its confusing. Dana White knows this, thats why he has 1 belt / division







Then everyone wont be ducking eachother

yes its like college bowl games, they are unnecessary you need a main one.

[shade darkar]

i think they should just have 2. that way we still get unification fights.

[siablo14]

no because then the best boxers wouldnt get the shot. for example if someone like mayweather was the only champ, top boxers like margo, cotto, prime mosley and so on would never get a shot at the belt due to him avoiding the dangerous guys till its the right time to fight them when they are over the hill.

if those fighter battled their way up to number 1 contender, he would have to face them or vacate the belt.