Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: Mayweather Has No Reason Not To Fight Me

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • tired of floyd's demands... get this fight on already..

    I don't know why FLOYD doesn't want to run through boxers like PAC does. PAC called out FLOYD on FLOYD'S 14 DAY request and FLOYD issues 'NO COMMENT' statment instead of YES or NO .. What the HELL?? Floyd's confused.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by gwildcat77 View Post
      I don't know why FLOYD doesn't want to run through boxers like PAC does. PAC called out FLOYD on FLOYD'S 14 DAY request and FLOYD issues 'NO COMMENT' statment instead of YES or NO .. What the HELL?? Floyd's confused.
      You're the one who is confused

      Comment


      • Originally posted by decipher View Post
        im being serious with this question here; are you ****** or blinded? Please read the following carefully and try to understand. It does not matter if floyd and mosely didnt get tested a full month before the fight. They key of the test is the element of randomness. As long as floyd and mosley knew that they could get tested up to the fight is what kept them from not doing anything. It would be a whole different story if there was a cutoff and they knew that for 14 day they could not be tested..that would compormise the grounds of the entire test therefore making it useless. the fact that those tests played out that way does not mean it will play out that way with pac and that is why he is asking for the 14 day cutoff. Btw the 14 day cutoff was implemented by floyd to try to save the fight in their last negotiations. that is now off the table cause pac turned it down. who do you blame for that pac or floyd? also these test did not come out of nowhere like u say..they were in the contract from day one..pac just used that as an excuse to get out of the fight..please take pac d*ck out your mouth.


        This whole Olympic style bull**** **** came out of now where.... Sr. makes a claim that Pac must be on something, and that everything he's doing is not possible...he must be on some type of Ped's. Then low and behold negotiations get underway and what's one of the stipulations on the contract...drug testing...so where does a sophisticated test like this come from out of no where? A test that has never been done before in the history of boxing...where does this come from? Why is it proposed? On what basis is this being proposed for? I think the fact that Mayweather's openly tried to ruin this guys image and accomplishments, and create doubt in the publics mind that a fighter like Pac could be dirty -- when there has been no evident's to back up such claims -- and the way they went about the whole ordeal of accusing, (when they themselves have a history of drug trafficing ect. who are they to accuse, let alone take serious) and then adding the cherry on top by asking for Olympic style drug testing; is nothing more then them slapping Pac dead in the face and saying your a cheat. Pac could have dismissed the whole test right up front, and said *** off. The fact is he didn't...he never said he wouldn't comply with testing as it was how far he was willing to go with it before he thought it would affect his ability to be 100% come fight night. The fault in this fight not happening should be placed on Mayweather... You don't accuse a guy of wrong doing an then try to negotiate a fight with him with an, an Olympic-style drug testing basically implying that he's a dirty fighter -- when there is no history or proof of him being dirty. Now for the fight against Mosley I can understand it -- the man openly admitted to using Ped's, and I can see why the doubt might be there -- there's a proven fact that the man has used Ped's. However for a guy like Pac who in his last 2 fights has only been able to come in 144 and 145 against Clottey and Cotto...come on man ped user? If you say so I guess... As for randomness of course I get the object of being random for the fight with Mosley and Mayweather -- but it does not apply to a fight with A Pac-Mayweather as you said it would be used with a cutoff making what you are saying about Mayweather-Mosley a moot point --as neither situation would be on the same terms of how testing would be conducted comparing Pac-Mayweather to Mosley-Mayweather...There for why are you pointing a moot fact out that does not play into a possible Pac-Mayweather fight? Mayweather was willing to fight Pac with a 14-day cut off, to which he himself said if Pac agreed to the test the fight would be a go. Pac has agreed, so why not push the fight through...if he indeed wants to salvage the fight with Pac...and he did implement this to save the fight the first time, and it was acceptable to him the first time around, why not this time around? The fight is on the table...why not push it through? If Pac is willing to say i will do 14 days after he wouldn't the first time to make the fight happen the 2nd time around...I ask you why not pull the trigger?

        Comment


        • Floyd's 14 day deman in JAN is granted. Don't use a MOSLEY win to change your mind.

          DAMN!! Floyd being a ***** again about drug testing so we gotta see another PAC vs NON-MAYWEATHER fight .. come on FLOYD.. 33 years old and only have 41 fights.. I think Golden Boy don't want to make this fight happen because their rep does down if their number 1 fighter loses.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by gwildcat77 View Post
            I don't know why FLOYD doesn't want to run through boxers like PAC does. PAC called out FLOYD on FLOYD'S 14 DAY request and FLOYD issues 'NO COMMENT' statment instead of YES or NO .. What the HELL?? Floyd's confused.
            another dumb pac **** did you not hear may said afther the mosley fight full ramdom testing no excpetion.pac refuse the 14 day cutoff in the first offer so its his fault.again ******, may gave his answer by saying full radom testing afther the mosly fight didt you understand that.

            Comment


            • then why didn't he just say NO DEAL instead of NO COMMENT.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by King22 View Post
                based on what?
                I think the point trying to be made is that Calzage retired undefeated. So with some people logic, that would mean that there was no blue print how to beat him. So technically that makes him better than Roy Jones, Bernard Hopkins, and what not.

                Do i think he is better...No. I personally do not think so, but if some people use the Mayweather logic, than yes he is, as no ever beat him.

                Comment


                • Team Pac all watched the May-Mosley fight just like we did so I am certain they heard Floyd say no OST no fight. I am sure they heard PBF state if my PPV dominates there will be no cutoff or 50/50

                  Comment


                  • Mayweather scared to fight pressure fighters.

                    Mayweather can't fight well when he is pressured. Watch the first fight of Castillo vs. Mayweather. He can't think well going backwards. Never could. That's why he is not wanting to fight Pacquiao or Paul Williams who are pressure fighters. Shane Mosley would have punished him in his prime. You saw what he did to him before he quickly gave out of gas, due to being out of fighting shape. A little stop and pop pressure and he almost got knocked out. Pacquaio is going to give him that all night. He don't want his (Mayweather's) face messed up, because Pacquaio will put a dent in his poor future acting career.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by incredible View Post
                      This whole Olympic style bull**** **** came out of now where.... Sr. makes a claim that Pac must be on something, and that everything he's doing is not possible...he must be on some type of Ped's. Then low and behold negotiations get underway and what's one of the stipulations on the contract...drug testing...so where does a sophisticated test like this come from out of no where? A test that has never been done before in the history of boxing...where does this come from? Why is it proposed? On what basis is this being proposed for? I think the fact that Mayweather's openly tried to ruin this guys image and accomplishments, and create doubt in the publics mind that a fighter like Pac could be dirty -- when there has been no evident's to back up such claims -- and the way they went about the whole ordeal of accusing, (when they themselves have a history of drug trafficing ect. who are they to accuse, let alone take serious) and then adding the cherry on top by asking for Olympic style drug testing; is nothing more then them slapping Pac dead in the face and saying your a cheat. Pac could have dismissed the whole test right up front, and said *** off. The fact is he didn't...he never said he wouldn't comply with testing as it was how far he was willing to go with it before he thought it would affect his ability to be 100% come fight night. The fault in this fight not happening should be placed on Mayweather... You don't accuse a guy of wrong doing an then try to negotiate a fight with him with an, an Olympic-style drug testing basically implying that he's a dirty fighter -- when there is no history or proof of him being dirty. Now for the fight against Mosley I can understand it -- the man openly admitted to using Ped's, and I can see why the doubt might be there -- there's a proven fact that the man has used Ped's. However for a guy like Pac who in his last 2 fights has only been able to come in 144 and 145 against Clottey and Cotto...come on man ped user? If you say so I guess... As for randomness of course I get the object of being random for the fight with Mosley and Mayweather -- but it does not apply to a fight with A Pac-Mayweather as you said it would be used with a cutoff making what you are saying about Mayweather-Mosley a moot point --as neither situation would be on the same terms of how testing would be conducted comparing Pac-Mayweather to Mosley-Mayweather...There for why are you pointing a moot fact out that does not play into a possible Pac-Mayweather fight? Mayweather was willing to fight Pac with a 14-day cut off, to which he himself said if Pac agreed to the test the fight would be a go. Pac has agreed, so why not push the fight through...if he indeed wants to salvage the fight with Pac...and he did implement this to save the fight the first time, and it was acceptable to him the first time around, why not this time around? The fight is on the table...why not push it through? If Pac is willing to say i will do 14 days after he wouldn't the first time to make the fight happen the 2nd time around...I ask you why not pull the trigger?
                      Good post. This is what i mean by being objective, and not "Loving" your fav fighter so much that it deletes rational, and being open minded from the brain.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP