Tweet
Khan is a ****head, apart from his jab he did look a bit ragged its a good job he was in with Malignaggi and not Bradley, Khan should shut his mouth and fight Bradley Maidana or Alexander, 12 -18 months Khan will have lost his alphabet title anyway
-
-
mckenzie hating
mckenzie was giving froch every other round against taylor and calzaghe against hopkins but called khan sluggish lolComment
-
Yeah ITV's commentary is bull****. They dont know how to score fights. Except for Barry though. He did a good job. He scored every round for Amir and said that he was impressed with him. McKenzie said that he doesnt see Paulie surviving the first three rounds.
. The HBO staff gave every round to Amir.
HBO commentary >>>> Sky commentary >>>> ITV commentaryComment
-
Mckenzie needs to be sacked!Comment
-
By Nick Parkinson, courtesy of The Daily Star
AMIR KHAN has slammed boxing pundit Duke McKenzie for criticising him during ITV’s broadcast of his world title win last weekend.
The Bolton boxer wowed an American crowd for the first time with an 11-round beating of Yank Paulie Malignaggi at New York’s Madison Square *Garden.
But Khan, 23, was upset with former three-weight world champion McKenzie’s views.
Khan (left), who will this week decide whether to fight again either in Manchester or London on July 31, said: “The American TV network HBO bosses shook my hand and told me I’m a great fighter and very exciting.
“It is great to have them *supporting me but, on the other hand, we’ve got ITV.
“We gave the fight to them – but the commentary from Duke McKenzie was so negative. I don’t know if he has got something against me. I do what I do in the ring and he is going out there criticising me, saying I am ragged and sluggish.
“The thing is, people believe what the commentators say.”
Khan does reckon Britain’s WBA heavyweight champion David Haye should fight either Wladimir or Vitali Klitschko in America.
He added: “If David Haye went over there and knocked out a Klitschko he would become a sensation.”Comment
-
The article doesn't follow on the vein of the title, it's 90% about Duke McKenzies commentary.
The only snippet on Haye, and he isn't even going as far to directly say Haye should fight a Klit next and no one else.
Poor article.Comment
-
Duke Mckenzie has always been a pretty bad commentator.
Surprised Khan doesn't know it.
He's a half empty kinad commentator along with some bad predicitons and ****.
Infact sometimes he doesn't even know basic facts and say worng things.
Wasn't it him who said no one beaten Kessler apart from Calzaghe? LOLComment
-
Is this like Khan fighting Maidana??Comment
-
read the full article, Khan never said that. This is known as distortion, interpolation and deceit.
I have to laugh at your obsession with khan fighting maidana.
Full article:
y Nick Parkinson, courtesy of The Daily Star
AMIR KHAN has slammed boxing pundit Duke McKenzie for criticising him during ITV’s broadcast of his world title win last weekend.
The Bolton boxer wowed an American crowd for the first time with an 11-round beating of Yank Paulie Malignaggi at New York’s Madison Square *Garden.
But Khan, 23, was upset with former three-weight world champion McKenzie’s views.
Khan (left), who will this week decide whether to fight again either in Manchester or London on July 31, said: “The American TV network HBO bosses shook my hand and told me I’m a great fighter and very exciting.
“It is great to have them *supporting me but, on the other hand, we’ve got ITV.
“We gave the fight to them – but the commentary from Duke McKenzie was so negative. I don’t know if he has got something against me. I do what I do in the ring and he is going out there criticising me, saying I am ragged and sluggish.
“The thing is, people believe what the commentators say.”
Khan does reckon Britain’s WBA heavyweight champion David Haye should fight either Wladimir or Vitali Klitschko in America.
He added: “If David Haye went over there and knocked out a Klitschko he would become a sensation.”Last edited by Vadrigar.; 05-23-2010, 06:24 AM.Comment
Comment