Nacho Beristain on Floyd Mayweather, Jr Vs Manny Pacquiao prediction

[Ray*]

Nacho is very clever trainer not so a good manager but very clever with his methods, But you cant pick a winner just based on the fact that Pacquiao looks spectacular while Mayweather doesnt.

[Ryn0]

I am actually surprised. Nacho knows his boxing. But to choose Pacquiao simply because he throws more punches is ******.

I didn't see him mention punch output at all :S

[Ryn0]

He said because Manny is exciting,he would want to pick Manny and also because of the 2nd round of Mayweather-Mosley but Mayweather wins even though he's boring

No, read it properly.

He picks Pacquiao and says Mayweather wins fights in general but is boring and unspectacular when doing it.

[Latim]

Link doesn't seem to work pal.

[dibzvincent143]

I am actually surprised. Nacho knows his boxing. But to choose Pacquiao simply because he throws more punches is ******.

So Pacquiao wins because he has a spectacular style?

gtfo Nacho you ****....

Get back to crying over Mayweather schooling your boy Marquez

he didn't said anything like that.
he even said mayweather wins. but just questioned its excitement.and other stuffs like that.

[hugh grant]

How do you see the Floyd Mayweather, Jr Vs Manny Pacquiao fight playing out if it ever happens?

NB: I’m inclined to pick Pacquiao because he’s the type of fighter that creates spectacular fights, he does not compromise to be spectacular, and also due to what I saw Shane Mosley do to Mayweather in the second round of their fight. I think it will be a spectacular, high tension fight; Pacquiao has very fast hands and hits very hard – great tools to have. Meanwhile Mayweather is always on the defensive and always takes the safest route, always short of spectacular. In that regard I don’t give Mayweather much credit. Sure he wins, but at what cost? For the people that pay for expensive tickets, it seems they are being shortchanged. He gives great lessons in boxing; no one will argue that, but very little spectacle and excitement.

http://**********.com/pag/article.php?aid=19942

If the fight goes the distance i think the judges have an obligation to the sport to just give the decision to pac. Becasue you know he will have earnt it.

[Filipino Floyd]

People should be coming to Beristain for more insight. His prediction and reasoning behind it, blew my mind. One fighter is "spectacular" and the other is "unspectacular". Pure genius!!!!

[peekabooboxing]

People should be coming to Beristain for more insight. His prediction and reasoning behind it, blew my mind. One fighter is "spectacular" and the other is "unspectacular". Pure genius!!!!

that pretty much sums it up. i mean there's no denying floyd is a master
boxer, but then again so are the klitschkos. but they're so darn boring ....

give me a tyson over the klitschkos any day
give us pacquiao over boringweather ...

[Junito-Rulez]

That's the opinion of a boxing trainer/expert, i can respect that even though i disagree. He picked southpaw stance+ workrate over skills+timing. Floyd needs to throw a lot more against Pacquiao, that's a fact. He needs the same kind of performance he produced VS Mosley.

[Junito-Rulez]

People should be coming to Beristain for more insight. His prediction and reasoning behind it, blew my mind. One fighter is "spectacular" and the other is "unspectacular". Pure genius!!!!

that pretty much sums it up. i mean there's no denying floyd is a master
boxer, but then again so are the klitschkos. but they're so darn boring ....

give me a tyson over the klitschkos any day
give us pacquiao over boringweather ...

That's not true Mayweather and Klits aren't on the same level. Klits are the most boring thing i've EVER seen in boxing.
Floyd is entertaining as hell. Except for the Baldomir and DLH fights, Floyd was involoved in a lot of classic brawls and dog fights: against Corley, Judah, Hatton; Castillo and Mosley.

I agree with Beristain's point: Pacquiao is a much more entertaining fighter. An A level version of Arturo Gatti.