Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Biggest Robbery In boxing history?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Medlrick Taylor vs. Julio Cesar Chavez 1

    Comment


    • #32
      Ike Quartey VS any big fight! lol

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by vze2hhvj
        Ike Quartey VS any big fight! lol
        It's true. Judges love to rob the soft-spoken african guy.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Eno
          Medlrick Taylor vs. Julio Cesar Chavez 1
          now that was the worst robbery in boxing history

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by RipTheJacker
            Hearns /Leonard
            Whitaker/Chavez
            About Whitaker-Chavez:

            "There was a general let down; Julio did not live up to expectations. He was supposed to lose three or four rounds and then wipe the guy out. In Mexico, seven out of ten newspapers agreed that Whitaker was robbed, and maybe eight of ten people believe Whitaker won." --Fernando Paramo of the Los Angeles-based La Opinion, quoted in an article written by Steve Farhood, The Ring, January 1994.

            The Ring scored the fight: 117-111, Whitaker, giving Whitaker rounds 2 to 8, as well as the 10th and 11th.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Eno
              It's true. Judges love to rob the soft-spoken african guy.
              They like robbing the fast talking cuban Joel Casamayor as well

              Comment


              • #37
                wenever Lamotta lost against Robinson it was a robbery, ****in guy would knock robinson down numerous times and lamotta would never feel the canvas but would still lose :@:@:@:@

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by psychopath
                  Finally somebody got to ask this? Would there be any worst robbery in boxing history than when a judge and the ref both commited blunders to deny the rightful winner the victory with two belts and titles at stake?

                  Would you honestly believe that at the Pac/JMM fight . . . a judge can misscore a round and the ref didn't deduct a point after so many low blow warnings? Until now I'm still shock that the boxing bodies and boxing commision involve didn't lift a finger to correct that result and infact denied the protest from
                  team Pac for "lack of merit".

                  The degree of worseness depends on what is at stake in the fight . . . I believe.
                  Watch out for the idiot dude

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    onyok velasco not winning the gold medal in atlanta olympics!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by grayfist
                      About Whitaker-Chavez:

                      "There was a general let down; Julio did not live up to expectations. He was supposed to lose three or four rounds and then wipe the guy out. In Mexico, seven out of ten newspapers agreed that Whitaker was robbed, and maybe eight of ten people believe Whitaker won." --Fernando Paramo of the Los Angeles-based La Opinion, quoted in an article written by Steve Farhood, The Ring, January 1994.

                      The Ring scored the fight: 117-111, Whitaker, giving Whitaker rounds 2 to 8, as well as the 10th and 11th.
                      Worse robbery in the modern boxing. Whitaker science was sweet. The robbery left a bitter taste to the sweet science.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP