Originally posted by Ray*
View Post
anyway, just check it out: whose motion is dismissed and who is granted. u may say *******s are too dumb to rejoice this early. the fact that dlh's appeal for motion to dismiss the case is denied means pac's case has something to consider with the fact that pac's motion is granted.
in other words, there is a case. and gbp's claimed opinion needs to be weigh if its libelous or not.
"De La Hoya and Schaeffer filed an Anti Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) motion and motion to dismiss the $5-million defamation suit Pacquiao filed against them.
At the same time, Judge Hicks granted Pacquiao’s ex-parte motion to conduct “limited discovery and modified briefing schedule" for defendants De La Hoya (Golden Boy Promotions owner) and Schaefer (Golden Boy’s chief executive officer)."
Comment