Hmm you must be another Klichko cheerleader. Anyway That is the point that we have been getting at. At least I have. Klichko needs to fight somebody for Gods sake. he has made his name off of fighting nobodies Everyone gives him accolade for the lewis fight but geuss what??? He lost.. There are a lot of fighters out there who should have won fights but they lost them due to poor judging. If he should be given accolade for losing a fight then Castillo should be given credit for beating mayweather in their first fight. Ike Quartey should be given accolade for beating De la Hoy, and we all know that Felix Sturm beat him too, as well as pernell whitaker. De La Hoya should be given credit for beating Trinidad.
Stop bowing down to klicko because of his loss and let us see him win against some credibel opponents for once
And to you Rahman, Johnson, barret, are credible contenders. Not in my eyes. And sorry if you feel like i am a Klitschko Cheerleader. Because in actuality i am not. I just dont understand why everyone takes pot shots at him. You act like i said he beat LL. I never said that, i said he was beating him like no one else ever did.
On to your little thing about dlh. I agree that they probably deserved the Win over DLH. But like i said, i didnt say that klitschko actaully beat LL. I just said in my opinion that VK would have won the fight if not for cuts, but he didnt win and i understand that. And when i said LL needs to fight the only man that has beaten him i meant that in a figurative, not a literal sense. On paper it says DLH won but obviously you disagree with the decision rendered, all im doing is the same thing. The mans face doesnt always tell the story.
And to you Rahman, Johnson, barret, are credible contenders. Not in my eyes. And sorry if you feel like i am a Klitschko Cheerleader. Because in actuality i am not. I just dont understand why everyone takes pot shots at him. You act like i said he beat LL. I never said that, i said he was beating him like no one else ever did.
On to your little thing about dlh. I agree that they probably deserved the Win over DLH. But like i said, i didnt say that klitschko actaully beat LL. I just said in my opinion that VK would have won the fight if not for cuts, but he didnt win and i understand that. And when i said LL needs to fight the only man that has beaten him i meant that in a figurative, not a literal sense. On paper it says DLH won but obviously you disagree with the decision rendered, all im doing is the same thing. The mans face doesnt always tell the story.
And to you Rahman, Johnson, barret, are credible contenders. Not in my eyes. And sorry if you feel like i am a Klitschko Cheerleader. Because in actuality i am not. I just dont understand why everyone takes pot shots at him. You act like i said he beat LL. I never said that, i said he was beating him like no one else ever did.
On to your little thing about dlh. I agree that they probably deserved the Win over DLH. But like i said, i didnt say that klitschko actaully beat LL. I just said in my opinion that VK would have won the fight if not for cuts, but he didnt win and i understand that. And when i said LL needs to fight the only man that has beaten him i meant that in a figurative, not a literal sense. On paper it says DLH won but obviously you disagree with the decision rendered, all im doing is the same thing. The mans face doesnt always tell the story.
Everyone takes shots at him not because he is not a likeable guy or anything like that but because of the immense hype that surrounds this guy. Basically they are trying to force a paper champion to be considered on the same level as many of the other greats. They also want Klichko to be looked at as the supremely dominant force in the Heavyweight division. (He is neither) He can possibly become a person who could be mentioned in these texes but as of now he has yet to achieve either status. Klichko is ok but he needs to kill out the guys I mentioned (Rahman, Johnson, barret) are the best contenders out there in a division that in my opinion is one of the worst since the Larry Holmes Era. There simply is no one there. SO yes out of the folks that are there they seem to be the most credible. Secondly they are the only american fighters out there other than byrd, Brewster, and Toney. Klichko said he wanted to take over America not Europe by fighting these people he would be taking over the american heavyweight world. Lewis Actually fought and beat the best that we had to offer. If Klichko wants respect and accolade then bring it on, he can earn it and be mentioned with the great and be mentioned as the only force at heavyweight blah blah blah... then all critics ya'll must hush. (Ala Winky Wright)
Everyone takes shots at him not because he is not a likeable guy or anything like that but because of the immense hype that surrounds this guy. Basically they are trying to force a paper champion to be considered on the same level as many of the other greats. They also want Klichko to be looked at as the supremely dominant force in the Heavyweight division. (He is neither) He can possibly become a person who could be mentioned in these texes but as of now he has yet to achieve either status. Klichko is ok but he needs to kill out the guys I mentioned (Rahman, Johnson, barret) are the best contenders out there in a division that in my opinion is one of the worst since the Larry Holmes Era. There simply is no one there. SO yes out of the folks that are there they seem to be the most credible. Secondly they are the only american fighters out there other than byrd, Brewster, and Toney. Klichko said he wanted to take over America not Europe by fighting these people he would be taking over the american heavyweight world. Lewis Actually fought and beat the best that we had to offer. If Klichko wants respect and accolade then bring it on, he can earn it and be mentioned with the great and be mentioned as the only force at heavyweight blah blah blah... then all critics ya'll must hush. (Ala Winky Wright)
But let us not forget that oleg beat rahman (yes i understand that it was one punch) but like everyone else is sayin about klitschko when he fought LL it doesnt matter if it was one punch or a cut, klitschko still lost. So why is rahman any more deserving than maskaev.
Everyone takes shots at him not because he is not a likeable guy or anything like that but because of the immense hype that surrounds this guy. Basically they are trying to force a paper champion to be considered on the same level as many of the other greats. They also want Klichko to be looked at as the supremely dominant force in the Heavyweight division. (He is neither) He can possibly become a person who could be mentioned in these texes but as of now he has yet to achieve either status. Klichko is ok but he needs to kill out the guys I mentioned (Rahman, Johnson, barret) are the best contenders out there in a division that in my opinion is one of the worst since the Larry Holmes Era. There simply is no one there. SO yes out of the folks that are there they seem to be the most credible. Secondly they are the only american fighters out there other than byrd, Brewster, and Toney. Klichko said he wanted to take over America not Europe by fighting these people he would be taking over the american heavyweight world. Lewis Actually fought and beat the best that we had to offer. If Klichko wants respect and accolade then bring it on, he can earn it and be mentioned with the great and be mentioned as the only force at heavyweight blah blah blah... then all critics ya'll must hush. (Ala Winky Wright)
But i do like the way you responded to my thtead. Rather than attack my opinion you just gave yours without an attack on mine.
But let us not forget that oleg beat rahman (yes i understand that it was one punch) but like everyone else is sayin about klitschko when he fought LL it doesnt matter if it was one punch or a cut, klitschko still lost. So why is rahman any more deserving than maskaev.
- Because unlike Klitschko, Rahman held a portion of the legitimate undisputed Heavyweight title
- Rahman (if he beats Barrett) is ranked #1 by the WBC. Isn't it convenient that Corrie Sanders gets a #1 ranking and title shot, but Rahman is being questioned
- Since beating Rahman, Maskiev has lost (by brutal KO) to Lance Whittaker, Kirk Johnson and 300+ lb Corey Sanders; and since and imbetween has not beat one fighter of note. Rahman, since then, has knocked out Lennox Lewis, and only lost to Lewis Holyfield and Ruiz
Comment