PBF-Castillo I & Pac-JMM II were NOT robberies!!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • krazyn8tive
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2009
    • 7970
    • 714
    • 996
    • 37,433

    #11
    It is a known fact that in the first JMM-Pac fight, one of the judges scored the first round 10-7 when it should have been 10-6 due to the 3 knockdowns. The two other judges had it correctly scored as 10-6. Due to this error, the fight was scored a draw. If that one judge was competent and could score correctly, history would have been written different. If you don't believe what I am saying is fact, look that **** up

    Comment

    • mrgreenfingers
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 658
      • 18
      • 51
      • 13,390

      #12
      Originally posted by krazyn8tive
      It is a known fact that in the first JMM-Pac fight, one of the judges scored the first round 10-7 when it should have been 10-6 due to the 3 knockdowns. The two other judges had it correctly scored as 10-6. Due to this error, the fight was scored a draw. If that one judge was competent and could score correctly, history would have been written different. If you don't believe what I am saying is fact, look that **** up
      we know this but thats not the point, if the judges score other rounds incorrectly to pac then thats where the robbery is, i dont neccesarily think it was a robbery in either fight, just marquez did then cleaner work and pacs lucky hes got power, but it can argued either way.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP