Pernell Whitaker Vs Floyd Mayweather?

[cooper5]

Floyd would not fight Whitaker, the truth.
__________________

haha . floyd wont even fight cotto, margarito or pacquiao
why would he fight whittaker ? .... dynamite had the right answer

I agree, but if he did Whitaker would school him. Whitaker was simular in the fact he was good boxer, great defensive wizzard and not a hard puncher.

But Whitaker took on the dangerous challenges to prove how good he is. He wasn't carefull in opponent selection to maintain a legacy. Plus Whitaker was a southpaw, a very good one. Mayweather would never fight him.

[roughred]

I agree, but if he did Whitaker would school him. Whitaker was simular in the fact he was good boxer, great defensive wizzard and not a hard puncher.

But Whitaker took on the dangerous challenges to prove how good he is. He wasn't carefull in opponent selection to maintain a legacy. Plus Whitaker was a southpaw, a very good one. Mayweather would never fight him.

exactly.


floyd is better at everything, including defense. is strong, has more power and pop.

floyd continues to adjust, figure pernell out and decisions him

what are you basing that on ? whittaker ain't no hatton, aint no judah
could mayweahter hang with julio caesar 86-0 chavez ? ... azumha nelson?
hell no !!!


the fact is whittaker fought a close fight with a young in prime oscar de la hoya. floyd struggled against an old one. that says it all.

[roughred]

whittaker wasnt even in his prime when he took on the hard punching
felix trinidad a guy that helped make bernard hopkins name

floyd wouldn ever do that. he wont even fight a smaller guy in pacquiao