Comments Thread For: Amir Khan-Paulie Malignaggi: The Post-Fight Report Card

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Amir Khan-Paulie Malignaggi: The Post-Fight Report Card

    It turned out to be what it looked like on paper: the easiest notable fights to pick so far in 2010.

    In a battle between two guys of comparable speed and boxing ability, pick the bigger, younger, more powerful guys when he’s in with someone who has a knockout percentage that looks like Tim Lincecum’s E.R.A…especially when the guy with the offensive advantages is a former Olympic Medalist with superstar hopes making a much hyped Madison Square Garden (and U.S. in general) debut. [Click Here To Read More]
  • £-4-£
    Liverpool FC
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 2750
    • 165
    • 319
    • 28,401

    #2
    This is BS. before the fight Khan and Malignaggi were both given an 'A' for speed. Post fight, both were still given an 'A'.

    Anyone who watched the fight could see that Khan was faster, how can Malignaggi be given the same speed rating as Khan? Ludicrous. Khan should be given an 'A+' for speed, Paulie an 'A'.

    Paulie's power should be given a 'D' at best. And his defense, based on that fight, a 'C', Khan landed 40% of 600 shots, and 41% of his jabs.

    Comment

    • NorvernRob
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 979
      • 296
      • 163
      • 15,074

      #3
      True story. Anyone without bias could see that Paulie was getting beaten up.

      Comment

      • rambo1962009
        Banned
        • Mar 2010
        • 150
        • 15
        • 0
        • 180

        #4
        Originally posted by £-4-£
        This is BS. before the fight Khan and Malignaggi were both given an 'A' for speed. Post fight, both were still given an 'A'.

        Anyone who watched the fight could see that Khan was faster, how can Malignaggi be given the same speed rating as Khan? Ludicrous. Khan should be given an 'A+' for speed, Paulie an 'A'.

        Paulie's power should be given a 'D' at best. And his defense, based on that fight, a 'C', Khan landed 40% of 600 shots, and 41% of his jabs.
        Khan:
        Speed = A+++, fastest p4p...no arguin tht

        Power = B, Not one punch KO power, but enuf to batter ur opponent like we saw

        Defense = B-, Double Guard very protective of his chin, but open to shots on the temple and face area...not alot of head movement

        Stamina = A, Showed no signs of wear and tear in terms of coming forward/hand and footspeed at all in the fight

        Jab Accuracy = A ... Right hand accuracy = C+ (needs to work on tht)

        Boxing Skills = A

        Aggression = 1st half of the fight = B- ... 2nd half of the fight = A

        Chin = Yet to be seen

        Overall = A- performance...pretty ****in amazing for a young 23 yr old who gktfo by a bum a couple of yrs ago

        Comment

        • purecyse
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 510
          • 36
          • 26
          • 8,235

          #5
          I believe the speed grades are correct. It wasn't about speed. This wasn't Pacquiao dancing circles around De La Hoya. This was two fighters of comparable speed with one having the advantage in height, length, timing and punch variation.

          For an example, look at the first Vernon Forrest/ Shane Mosley fight. Forrest was nowhere near as fast as Mosley but, as he said, a jab neutralizes speed.

          Now, with that in mind, Khan employed a solid jab to control Malinaggi's movement and intelligently moved in behind that jab to apply further damage. When Malinaggi began to start timing Khan in the earlier rounds and caught him with some solid jabs and flush check hooks, which landed right around the chin area (I think Malinaggi should have the lowest power grade possible), Roach started to coach Khan to step in behind a double jab. From there the damage began to pile on.

          Comment

          • Ryn0
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2007
            • 11139
            • 310
            • 269
            • 20,767

            #6
            This is ******ed, How is their defense the same?

            Khan was hit sure, but he was hit much less and managed to avoid alot more punches than Paulie and he still holds a lesser rating than Paulie?

            Khan was faster than Paulie too, totally wrong.

            Comment

            • MWNYG
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 66
              • 3
              • 85
              • 6,128

              #7
              Paulie B+ defense? what?

              Comment

              • BetterCallSaul
                Shot!
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 9026
                • 598
                • 681
                • 16,488

                #8
                Cliff Rold doesn't seem to like Khan very much. He states that Bradley and Alexander are much better fighters than Khan, but I don't think that is the case. I believe Khan to be the better, or at least comparable to Bradley and Alexander in boxing skills and ability. He has more speed than both fighters, and arguably more power than both too. Plus his jab and defence is superior to them both.

                In my eyes, apart from the chin problem, Khan shares the top of the 140 division with Bradley and Alexander while the rest of the division look at them from below.

                Comment

                • Rudie Cant Fail
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 285
                  • 9
                  • 1
                  • 339

                  #9
                  Paulie B+ defense? Does catching nearly every punch with your face count as a parry these days?

                  Comment

                  • Dan Gutierrez
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 846
                    • 38
                    • 0
                    • 7,241

                    #10
                    Verbal Assaults

                    They should also rate fighters for foul verbal assaults.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP