Which is a "bigger" robbery? Floyd-Castillo 1 or Pacman-JMM 2

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bojangles1987
    bo jungle
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 41118
    • 1,326
    • 357
    • 63,028

    #11
    Pacquiao-Marquez 2 was not a robbery, it was no where near a robbery, and I don't understand how people think it was a robbery. The only fight you can consider a robbery there is the first one, if only because Marquez dominated so much of the fight after the three knockdowns, but knockdowns do count.

    If you have to call either fight a robbery, it would be Castillo-Mayweather 1, we all know about Floyd's shoulder but Castillo still got a little screwed by the judges. He damn near clean sweeped the second half of the fight, yet the judges had him losing by 4 or 5 points.

    Comment

    • dcull111
      Contender
      • Apr 2010
      • 193
      • 14
      • 8
      • 6,475

      #12
      easily floyd/castillo imo

      Comment

      • Kagami Taiga
        Generation of Miracles
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 19078
        • 703
        • 228
        • 40,183

        #13
        u guys watch boxing and yet ppl still dnt kno wat a robbery is. a robbery is not a close fight where the judges could have scored it either way. a robbery is a fight where on fighter totally dominates another fighter but loses on the cars. jmm did not completely dominate pac and castillo did not completely dominate floyd. neither were robberies.

        u wanna see a robbery look at froch/dirrel. or look at rjj and floyds olympic fights. those were robberies.

        Comment

        • Rome-By-Ko
          The winner Is
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 20157
          • 323
          • 332
          • 29,833

          #14
          Originally posted by DempseyRollin
          u guys watch boxing and yet ppl still dnt kno wat a robbery is. a robbery is not a close fight where the judges could have scored it either way. a robbery is a fight where on fighter totally dominates another fighter but loses on the cars. jmm did not completely dominate pac and castillo did not completely dominate floyd. neither were robberies.

          u wanna see a robbery look at froch/dirrel. or look at rjj and floyds olympic fights. those were robberies.
          Froch Dirrel was not a robbery Dirrell ran like a ***** and lost like he should have.JLC was rob in that first fight with May just by the Margin he lost by it was like the judges did not give him any rds he lost by like 4 rds what the hell?They were way off.

          Comment

          • bojangles1987
            bo jungle
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 41118
            • 1,326
            • 357
            • 63,028

            #15
            Originally posted by romebyko
            Froch Dirrel was not a robbery Dirrell ran like a ***** and lost like he should have.JLC was rob in that first fight with May just by the Margin he lost by it was like the judges did not give him any rds he lost by like 4 rds what the hell?They were way off.
            Really, it wasn't a robbery, it's just that those scorecards are ludicrous. There is no way Mayweather won that fight by the margins the judges scored it.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP