Amir Khan is the best fighter from Britain.

[Shadows]

Ian Napa nuthuggers

Don't make me post our conversation in this thread.....

[Horus]

Quit talking about guys like Froch and Haye. Khan is the trut, he just has a chin that will always hold him back,

Former Undisputed and RING CW, and Current WBA HW Champion David Haye>> Amir Khan WBA Jr. WW champion


It is not even close.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

David Haye is better than Khan.

Kell Brook is also better IMO.

[FeFist]

In terms of resume and ability Haye is better than Khan.

[Gordon_Gekko]

Khan and Haye are our only world champions.

[John Hue]

Kell Brook is the sleeper. He does not get the publicity but I rate him above Khan. We have yet to see Khan in a competative fight that is not a forgone conclusion. Untill you see fighters in those type of fights it is hard to determine what you are looking at.

[Guest]

You're turning into a bore, Street Bully.

[Sparked_1985]

I just wish both of them had good chins like Carl Froch.

David Haye is the standard bearer for boxing in Britain now.

If he ever actually fights a bloody Klitschko and does well then boxing is going to go BOOM! in this country.

Both guys are very important to the overrall health of British boxing. In regards to general interest, crossover,television coverage. If you're a fan of British boxing you have to want both to do well.

Anyway, I digress. Amir Khan is a better fighter in my opinion, elite speed, more active, gets hit less, better combination puncher, a commitment to a jab. A determination to stick to a gameplan.

Khan is still gonna get KO'd against a guy like Maidana though and Amir Khan's turds have more talent than Maidana. His chin is guilty.

[Boxin']

Former Undisputed and RING CW, and Current WBA HW Champion David Haye>> Amir Khan WBA Jr. WW champion


It is not even close.

Paper titles mean anything now?

[Sparked_1985]

Paper titles mean anything now?

Didn't know you could possess three paper titles at once, along with the paper ring title.