Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How regularly do you think Pacquaio would land against Mayweather?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
    i think a lot of you guys are underestimating floyd's reach and his ability to control distance. if he fights at long range or if he fights in the pocket against pac, pac is really gonna have a hard time gettin off. like i said b4, pac is gonna have to rely on his footwork and his punch speed and punch angles. a lot of you guys on here really dnt appreciate floyds abilities. he's gonna make u miss. thats a fact. you arent gonna land anywhere near 30 or 40 percent on him. pac just has to make sure that what he is capable of landing actually hurts.
    thats what im talking about, I dont know if these fools are serious or just having a good laugh if they think Pacs going to just zoom in and out throwing punches non stop for 12 rounds and not get tired from missing 80% of his punches... its like they're expecting Floyd to just stand there.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by trainhard_187 View Post
      Alot of you all make it seem like Floyd is invisible or something, but the dude can and will get hit by Pac..

      Even lightweight Marquez hit him what more Pacman who throws awkward angle punches from both hands with speed combinations..

      Floyd will get hit and often too..
      Marquez landed 12 percent of his punches. That's not a very good example.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
        I think the fact that Pac will land a lot more than PBF would like, we will see PBF go into his shell a bit more than he did against SSM.

        Or a lot more to be honest i hope.
        There you go.

        Comment


        • #54
          Manny would hardly land. Mosely was lucky to get his 2 shots in. Mayweather aint getting hit like that next fight, he will mke sure of it. Manny would eat so many right hands man, i really like the guy aswell (Manny), i really dont think they want the right. Its obvious Floyd Money Mayweather will win UD. I would bet my house.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by RandomGeezer View Post
            Manny would hardly land. Mosely was lucky to get his 2 shots in. Mayweather aint getting hit like that next fight, he will mke sure of it. Manny would eat so many right hands man, i really like the guy aswell (Manny), i really dont think they want the right. Its obvious Floyd Money Mayweather will win UD. I would bet my house.
            that's some ****ed up dumb ****. Mosley was lucky to land in the 2nd? that's the most pathetic excuse of them all. It's not like he was aiming at Floyd, he just got lucky that he landed and buckled him. Thanks for the info.

            Comment


            • #56
              Twenty years from now, people will look back at Mayweather-Pacquiao just like we look back at Holmes-Cooney. They will wonder how was this such a big fight, cuz how could anyone have thought Pacquiao/Cooney had a chance to win going in? Then they'll remember it was all because of prejudice.

              Comment


              • #57
                Lucky punch. you see a lot of it in boxing. Thats why you didnt see no more from him. If he 'set him up perfectly' then i think we would of seen more from mosley. but he just threw with his eyes closed and landed. then he threw a few more times but couldnt get him.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by BadNewz View Post
                  Twenty years from now, people will look back at Mayweather-Pacquiao just like we look back at Holmes-Cooney. They will wonder how was this such a big fight, cuz how could anyone have thought Pacquiao/Cooney had a chance to win going in? Then they'll remember it was all because of prejudice.
                  Mayweather and Holmes might be a decent comparison but Pacquiao and Cooney? Comon man. Mayweather already had his Cooney and his name was Ricky Hatton.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by PH|L View Post
                    Mayweather and Holmes might be a decent comparison but Pacquiao and Cooney? Comon man. Mayweather already had his Cooney and his name was Ricky Hatton.
                    I think he is referring to the magnitude and hype of what turned out to be a one-sided fight than actually comparing the specific boxers involved.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      I think it would depend on Mayweather's ability to time and counter Pacquiao, don't know which will come out on top honestly.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP