Mayweather vs Pac who is in a disadvantage regarding PEDS?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spoon23
    INVINCIBLE
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 20624
    • 922
    • 904
    • 107,969

    #81
    Originally posted by No Ceilings
    Why do you keep bumping these thresads with the same subjects: PEDS and Purse splits.
    Why do you keep harping nonsense post?? Geez man your welcome here but please don't pollute lol

    Comment

    • craigus1990
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 1094
      • 116
      • 80
      • 8,010

      #82
      you dont think these girls diet? they r on a strict regime to lose weight and stay small all the time but anyway dude we will never c eye to eye on it... i mean for me stricter testing will always be a good thing but i mean its not for me to work it out is it... ooo and just thought u kinda owned urself cos i mean u say pac will be more effected cos he is naturally smaller? well cos of tht he is able to eat lots of food... if u seen him on vids he eats **** loads to keep weight on but mayweather wont be able to eat as much... so it is mayweather dieting not manny... y dont u care about mayweather getting weaker come to think of it lol :P

      Comment

      • craigus1990
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 1094
        • 116
        • 80
        • 8,010

        #83
        Originally posted by No Ceilings
        Why do you keep bumping these thresads with the same subjects: PEDS and Purse splits.
        cos we are alowed to discuss things we wana talk about... i mean this aint a burners topics only forum lol

        Comment

        • Spoon23
          INVINCIBLE
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 20624
          • 922
          • 904
          • 107,969

          #84
          Originally posted by craigus1990
          you dont think these girls diet? they r on a strict regime to lose weight and stay small all the time but anyway dude we will never c eye to eye on it... i mean for me stricter testing will always be a good thing but i mean its not for me to work it out is it... ooo and just thought u kinda owned urself cos i mean u say pac will be more effected cos he is naturally smaller? well cos of tht he is able to eat lots of food... if u seen him on vids he eats **** loads to keep weight on but mayweather wont be able to eat as much... so it is mayweather dieting not manny... y dont u care about mayweather getting weaker come to think of it lol :P
          Go explain that to Nsac you seem more educated than the expert docotrs who voted against it.

          I'm no expert but there is always a better way. Boxing ain't olympics. There should always be a way for all kinds of sport.

          In this case PRO boxing is not Olympics.

          I'm up for stricter testing but there are other ways like hair testing. It last longer than urine or blood, but takes longer testing procedure.

          But if a champ won a fight and the hair test comes out positive after a few weeks for ped's then strip him of his belt and can be in shamed after it. So therefore, they wouldn't even dare take peds knowing they can get caught and lose face for sure.

          See there other ways. Urine is 1 that is non evasive, but not all are detectable in urine. But hair the chemical make-up will stay there for months.
          See there's other ways aside from blood testing. The experts just have to figure it out how on how to do it.

          hair is non evasive and doesn't affect performance and stays longer.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP