Comments Thread For: Guerrero vs Casamayor in Play For Marquez-Diaz PPV

[boxing2106]

guzman didnt take this cuz he knows that he wont get no credit for beating casamayor. at this point guzman wants fights that can get him exposure and have more meaning if he wins. but with casamayor he isnt getting anything. seriously what does guzman get from beating a washed up casamayor. ****** that the article says for unknown reasons when the reasons are obvious

[oscar_angels091]

Guzman wanted the fight at light heavyweight and Casamayor didn't want any part in it.

hahahahaha good one!!

[Doctor_Tenma]

What happened to Joan Guzman?

He looked 180 lbs when he worked the corner for Argenis Mendez, when Mendez faced Honorio. So Guzman blew up again; dude should retire.

[Dambala]

what you talk like Guerrerro is washed up or has been on a string of losses, I think you mean for Casamayor it's now or never. Guerrerro is with GBP and they got him fighting on a regular

C'mon man, what I mean is that he was ready to stardom and then he had management problems, his wife's sickness and that kept him inactive like for a year, then he signed with GBP and on his first fight he was criticize because he withdrew because he got cut and he has some problems finding opponents and it's been too long now, he needs a breakthrough performance to make his name, I mean he has all the tools but he's been really unlucky I never said he was shot or anything like that.

[Kevin Malone]

If half of these undercards workout that's gonna be one hell of a card. I may purchase it instead of streaming...

[Dambala]

why unlucky? I believe he has one or two belts and he hasnt lost since 2005. Anyways, yeah, this fight should be interesting...

Like I said on the post above, he has all the tools but too many problems kept him away from the spotlight.

[Dambala]

Yep, and I wonder how effective Casa will be at 140..... anyone see the Davis fight ?

Yes I have the same curiosity, btw Guerrero will be skipping a weight class so I don't know if he would be effective too.