Best latino boxers: Mexican or rican?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
I am a fan of boxing but this is ridiculous who cares which country has better boxers. I love boxing down care about the skin color, or country or whatever else. I am glad countries celebrate their boxing and that they have a awesome rivalry that us fans capitalize on but be serious we are fans of the sport.Comment
-
Nope, I am saying that Morales was better then Zaragosa, that Zaragosa looked good in his previous bout. Where did I write he was in his prime? Please proof read and get back to me. Morales is a all time great, above and beyond Zaragosa, he fought more champions in more weight classes with more wins over them. Not very difficult to figure out.Comment
-
Why did Tito have so much trouble hurting Hopkins when he had such an easy time hurting Joppy who was straight schooling him till his phenomenal left hook landed. Weird huh? Tito ruined some good fighters with illegal wraps, it isn't questionable it is the truth. The guy who did his wraps said he always did them that way, which was illegal. So it is difficult to say how Tito would have done if he fought fairly. So be careful now both countries have cheaters.
I am a fan of boxing but this is ridiculous who cares which country has better boxers. I love boxing down care about the skin color, or country or whatever else. I am glad countries celebrate their boxing and that they have a awesome rivalry that us fans capitalize on but be serious we are fans of the sport.
However, Tito wraps were NOT illegal in Nevada or all the other places Tito fought in.
And, Joppy was not schooling Tito. What fight were you watching?Comment
-
Why no Thread which Asian Country had the best champs Thailand, Japan, Phillippines, or South Korea?
Why always latino vs latino? Sure i am guilty of thowing some par for the course, but it is mainly tongue and cheek. I don't care much about the etnicity of a fighter. Salvador Sanchez even talked well about puerto rican fighter Juan la porte who took him to 15 rounds.
Maybe with the mess in Arizona bringing a race war between latinos is what some want?Comment
-
First of all Tito wraps were only illegal in New York... So I give you that Joppy fight and a few other fights in New York that Tito had illegal wraps.
However, Tito wraps were NOT illegal in Nevada or all the other places Tito fought in.
And, Joppy was not schooling Tito. What fight were you watching?
What not illegal? So it is cool to wrap your hands like a cast in NV but not NY? So it is cool to put tape between the layers of tape instead of gauze like your suppose to? I find that hard to believe my friend. It is illegal and he knew it was illegal, why do you think he didn't want to pull his hand out of the glove against B-Hop. It is illegal plain and simple, the wraps are for protecting your hands not hurting the other fighter, Tito's were not to protect hands but to hurt the other fighter.
Every fighter has been known to do illegal things it is how it goes. Tito and B-hop both had punches wander south. Cotto does the same. Holyfield was known for head butts. Pryor and the mysterious black bottle. It happens.Comment
-
Why did Tito have so much trouble hurting Hopkins when he had such an easy time hurting Joppy who was straight schooling him till his phenomenal left hook landed. Weird huh? Tito ruined some good fighters with illegal wraps, it isn't questionable it is the truth. The guy who did his wraps said he always did them that way, which was illegal. So it is difficult to say how Tito would have done if he fought fairly. So be careful now both countries have cheaters.
I am a fan of boxing but this is ridiculous who cares which country has better boxers. I love boxing down care about the skin color, or country or whatever else. I am glad countries celebrate their boxing and that they have a awesome rivalry that us fans capitalize on but be serious we are fans of the sport.Comment
-
Comment
Comment