you didn't say p4p you said top boxers in the world. p4p has the connotation that if all fighters were the same size who would be the best and in that case Klitschko probably wouldn't make it to top 5 cus a 220 lbs floyd mayweather in theory would dominate him etc, but you said the best PERIOD not p4p, so THAT has the connotation of skills and achievements and other things combined and with that said Klitschko belongs on such a list so don't hate.
Top 5 Boxers in the world in no particluar order.
Collapse
-
Hahahaha. Burner got owned.when you write "41 have tried 41 have failed" in your sig, you should really change it to 40 have tried because Floyd had a rematch with Jose Luis Castillo so 2 of those 41 fights were with the same person, that means 40 actual different people have tried and failed to beat Floyd.Comment
-
Comment
-
No this is a P4P List.you didn't say p4p you said top boxers in the world. p4p has the connotation that if all fighters were the same size who would be the best and in that case Klitschko probably wouldn't make it to top 5 cus a 220 lbs floyd mayweather in theory would dominate him etc, but you said the best PERIOD not p4p, so THAT has the connotation of skills and achievements and other things combined and with that said Klitschko belongs on such a list so don't hate.
I dont rank heavies. No one does.Comment
-
Comment
-
What the fuck does that have to do with anything??1st of all, Wlad Klitschko needs to be on that list, he's been active longer and reigned as champ longer and more dominantly than everyone on that list
2ndly. when you write "41 have tried 41 have failed" in your sig, you should really change it to 40 have tried because Floyd had a rematch with Jose Luis Castillo so 2 of those 41 fights were with the same person, that means 40 actual different people have tried and failed to beat Floyd.
He said top 5 boxers right now, not who has the best resume and has reigned longestComment
-
why didn't you say it's p4p then, sounds like you're backtracking now. it didn't start out as p4p now suddenly it is just so you could exclude the true 5th greatest fighter on the planet Wlad Klitschko. Sounds like a racist agenda to me.
Anyways perhaps your sig to be most accurate should say "40 have tried 41 times, but all 40 have failed 41 times, given the fact that one unfortunate somebody failed twice in a row"
Comment
-
Stop trolling my thread.why didn't you say it's p4p then, sounds like you're backtracking now. it didn't start out as p4p now suddenly it is just so you could exclude the true 5th greatest fighter on the planet Wlad Klitschko. Sounds like a racist agenda to me.
Anyways perhaps your sig to be most accurate should say "40 have tried 41 times, but all 40 have failed 41 times, given the fact that one unfortunate somebody failed twice in a row"
Didnt I already explain my sig to you?Comment
Comment